User talk:74.88.212.24

Recent edit to Santino Marella

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Santino Marella, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! --L235 (talk) Ping when replying 06:06, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Original research

Hi, though I know you meant well, please don't add original research to articles as you did at Kung Fu Panda: Legends of Awesomeness here and here. We don't need speculation in the form of "it's supposed to possibly return later on in 2015", nor do we need statements like "It's unknown when to return". The fact that you don't know something, doesn't mean that it is unknown, and we typically do not include "unknowns" in articles. Encyclopedias contain information, not the lack of it. Additionally, if English grammar isn't your strong suit, you should probably post edit requests on talk pages instead of trying to add the content yourself, since this creates additional work for other editors. For these reasons, I am removing your edits on this subject. It's nothing personal. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:00, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Please don't ignore embedded notes

Hi, in these edits [1][2] you seem to ignore embedded notes at List of Kung Fu Panda: Legends of Awesomeness episodes that are intended to instruct unfamiliar editors such as yourself with guidelines like WP:TVUPCOMING. Making changes while ignoring these notes is considered disruptive and can be grounds for blocking your IP. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:46, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Ephemeral statements.

I've removed the disputed content at Kung Fu Panda: Legends of Awesomeness because you don't seem to understand how ephemeral statements work. Ephemeral statements should be presented in the past tense, since they are fleeting, and it is assumed that by the time the reader reads it, it is out of date and occurred in the past. When April 2015 rolls around, saying "as of March 2015, these episodes currently were unaired" doesn't make any sense, because "currently" means "now". It makes even less sense the more specific we get with our ephemeral date. "As of March 9, 2015, these episodes currently were unaired" makes no sense on March 10th, because again, "currently" is now, not yesterday. Contrarily, "As of March 9, 2015, these episodes had not yet aired" makes perfect sense. Don't agree? Then you might want to get other opinions at the reference desk. Otherwise, we don't need the ephemeral statement if you can't commit to grammar norms. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:54, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

June 2015

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Santino Marella. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 03:37, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Benhen1997. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kung Fu Panda: Legends of Awesomeness, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ben^Yes? 16:44, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---