User talk:74.56.133.108

January 2018

Hello, I'm Donner60. Your recent edit to Orange Order in Canada appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 23:09, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edit to User talk:Donner60 constitutes vandalism. It has been or removed. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Donner60 (talk) 23:18, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:CambridgeBayWeather. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Acroterion (talk) 23:41, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User talk:CambridgeBayWeather. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Acroterion (talk) 23:48, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 21:00, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

74.56.133.108 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I shouldn't be blocked in the first place, I'm merely trying to correct false, extremely insulting information what was written by probable Canadians, with the purpose of confusing readers with vagueness while disparaging my very own ancestors.74.56.133.108 (talk) 21:03, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 21:05, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Right Great Wrongs

You give the impression you are here to right great wrongs. Wikipedia isn't the place for this. It's important to know that this doesn't make you or your information incorrect, it's simply that Wikipedia isn't the place for this. The article I linked to goes into quite a bit more detail here. Again, you may be entirely correct in your various assertions, but that doesn't mean that your edits were appropriate here. You'll also want to read WP:NPA. --Yamla (talk) 21:12, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Am I to understand that OBVIOUS HISTORICAL REVISIONISM is WELCOME at wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.56.133.108 (talk • contribs)

You are to understand that Wikipedia is not the place to right great wrongs. Please take the time to read the policies and guidelines I've linked you to. --Yamla (talk) 23:10, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Hello, I'm PaulKeeperson. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mordecai Richler have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. PaulKeeperson (talk) 22:34, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.