User talk:72.234.220.38

Close paraphrasing

That is simply mild close paraphrasing. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:26, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

You were previously warned of the same here [1] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:29, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please be much more careful. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:32, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Doc James:. I've done one more pass over the text. It's probably the best I can do without changing the actual meaning of the data presented by the original referenced secondary source. If you feel yet more is needed, it will probably be up to another editor. Also, not that it matters, but compared to a plethora of other articles I follow, to me it now has far less original source "feel" than they do.

btw, I saw that you may have used Twinkle to block my static-IP for a while? "(Your IP address has been blocked from editing. (TW))"? That would have been a bit quick, no? This certainly would have overstepped the Wikipedia Policies on the blocking of any good faith editor, especially after an editor was quickly & actively working to correct an issue. I wholly support your efforts in making Wikipedia better and keeping edits within policy and am also certain you know that you, yourself, must do this within policy. As my edit was not blocked, it could have just been an "oops"? Regards – 72.234.220.38 (talk) 09:33, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Vancouver Lake have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.
Your edit here to Vancouver Lake was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XvVhUzmO9LI) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 22:45, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Fully within Wikipedia policy. Video is (C) by the The Columbian who control that Youtube channel. See: Wikipedia:Video_links

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Joseph Warren into List of military leaders in the American Revolutionary War. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:45, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting, thank you for explaining this @Diannaa:. This policy is newer or "deeper" than I've been involved with in past editing. I certainly would have added a citation to the copied paragraph, if one existed in the original one. I was unaware about using a {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination, should have added a note in the edit summary for sure. 72.234.220.38 (talk) 01:39, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Owyhee River. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:19, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Thanks for pointing this out @Diannaa: The text for the short tributaries section I've been creating for this article came directly from another Wikipedia article. In this case, from the West Little Owyhee River article. It seems I simply failed to also move over the source acknowledgement reference at the same time as it had been placed further down in that article's text. Great job catching this. It seems I also made a similar omission on the sentence added for the Little Owyhee River and now have corrected that too.

Fixed. — 72.234.220.38 (talk) 05:16, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 12:27, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

|title = 
|quote = As every one may not recognize these boundaries by their original Indian names, it may be well to observe, that the Neperan is that beautiful stream, vulgarly called the Saw-Mill River, which, after winding gracefully for many miles through a lovely valley, shrouded by groves, and dotted by Dutch farm-houses, empties itself into the Hudson, at the ancient drop of Yonkers.
|source = – Washington Irving, Wolfert's Roost, Chronicle II^[1]
|align = left
|width = 300px
|border = 
|fontsize = 
|bgcolor = #89cff0
|style = 
|title_bg = 
|title_fnt = 
|tstyle = 
|qalign = 
|qstyle = 
|quoted = 
|salign = right
|sstyle =

}} -->

May 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The Donnas, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 08:11, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, I admire your citation-dedication @Materialscientist:. 😉 But you're right, it is policy - even on an article like this one, which is almost totally lacking references and the ones it has point to dead webpages. Guess we have to start someplace. Even to add a single "*". Regards.

Fixed – ░▒▓ №∶72.234.220.38 (talk) 08:26, 10 May 2020 (UTC) ▓▒░[reply]

Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to The Donnas have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.
Your edit here to The Donnas was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (https://www.discogs.com/label/132036-SuperTeem!) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 08:32, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Paging User:Walor

Hello @Walor: - as you do not seem to read/reply-to messages on your User talk:Walor page, I thought I'd try contact you from my User talk page. Will this work? This is in reference to this question I placed on your page. Regards. – ░▒▓ №∶72.234.220.38 (talk) 08:00, 21 May 2020 (UTC) ▓▒░[reply]

June 2020

Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Dig It (Skinny Puppy song) have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.
Your edit here to Dig It (Skinny Puppy song) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CDKkRSUrTd8) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 12:53, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for your constructive edits, IP! Ed6767 (talk) 01:07, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wow Ed6767, bestowing a Barnstar

on a lowly IP editor like me? I'm honored, thank you! 👍 I do try. – ░▒▓ №∶72.234.220.38 (talk) 01:18, 6 June 2020 (UTC) ▓▒░[reply]

It's no problem - feel free to ask if you need anything -- you should consider making an account if you ever want to edit protected pages, shame they don't let good IPs be autoconfirmed. Ed6767 (talk) 01:22, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. I appreciate the offer! I consider making an account every decade or so... been on-n-off Wiki editing since 2005. Well, maybe I consider more often than that as us lowly IP editors get constant CAPTCHA challenges to make sure we're not a spamming-bot. 😟 It would be a bit tricky to autoconfirm good IPs I feel. It probably could be done with SSL type certs but it would be confusing for many editors. It's also simpler to just make an account! One day maybe. Having my edits anonymously scattered across 5 IPs over the years is a bit sad. Regards. – ░▒▓ №∶72.234.220.38 (talk) 11:00, 6 June 2020 (UTC) ▓▒░[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Duke Decter. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it.
Your edit here to Duke Decter was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (https://www.discogs.com/Disorderly-Conduct-Amen/master/1181008) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 04:13, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

June 2020

Your addition to The KKK Took My Baby Away has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Binksternet (talk) 05:41, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The media's [Fair Use rational] of it being a short snippit, with a low sample rate and other listed reasons should allow this file to remain. – ░▒▓ №∶72.234.220.38 (talk) 06:08, 13 June 2020 (UTC) ▓▒░[reply]

Hi Binksternet, I hope you can impart some of your knowledge on me regarding this subject. Enlightened by your warning, I've just spent way too much time reading much of the Wikipedia docs on copyright within the project, cases where exceptions are granted, fair use, etc. And I'm still a bit confused. Is there a chance, even with what would seem to be proper fair use documentation, that Wikipedia could still "get in trouble" for media content in articles? I ask because I see conversations saying that more than one use of copyrighted media content, even under fair use, may not be permissible. All the discussions I saw seemed to be about images, but I'm assuming it could apply to audio in the same way.

I confess my ignorance in not knowing that for each use of non-free-to-use media file, there must be a fair use justification on the media file's page. But even now that I've done this, and feel it's correct based on both documentation and other editor's examples, I worry that it may not be enough. Do you know if there are documents or talk-pages that state what items should probably be used in one, and only one, article? As always, my wish is to improve our encyclopedia and the idea this could be an issue is something I'd like to be clear on. Thanks in advance. – ░▒▓ №∶72.234.220.38 (talk) 08:37, 13 June 2020 (UTC) ▓▒░[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Backstabbers Incorporated, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings.
Your edit here to Backstabbers Incorporated was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/pages/BACKSTABBERS-INC/129549603747153) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 07:57, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Fixed – See Talk – ░▒▓ №∶72.234.220.38 (talk) 08:37, 13 June 2020 (UTC) ▓▒░[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Abnormality (band). Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines.
Your edit here to Abnormality (band) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/AbnormalityOfficial/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 23:15, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Fixed again – See Talk – ░▒▓ №∶72.234.220.38 (talk) 09:35, 19 June 2020 (UTC) ▓▒░[reply]

RPP request

I am using hatnote to listen and noticed your edits and when adding some pages for protection noticed this: Wikipedia:Requests for page protection#List of Deep Purple members being used. Jerod Lycett (talk) 03:19, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Jerod Lycett, appreciated. 👍 I'll hop over there and try enlighten the discussion a bit more. – ░▒▓ №∶72.234.220.38 (talk) 03:23, 19 June 2020 (UTC) ▓▒░[reply]

Talk:Prince George of Cambridge#RfC about the infobox photo

FYI, a new image has been added to that discussion. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 17:02, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

^ Cite error: The named reference Wolfert's Roost was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.

[Wolfert's_Roost-1] Cite error: The named reference Wolfert's Roost was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[1]