Jump to content

User talk:72.229.242.36

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing!--🐦DrWho42👻 20:22, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits on the polling page

[edit]

Hi, I'm writing this because of Wikipedia's 3 revert rule. We should come to compromise or one of us will get blocked. If you're so determined on keeping the newspaper's notice (and the newspaper for some reason and not the actual surveyer?), would you be ok with me tagging Gezici and Avrasya as close to the opposition, because the owners of both had had been members of parliament candidates from CHP? Betseg (talk) 04:48, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fine with that, mainly because Areda really is the worst offender with these polls, in fact you could go ahead and add the warning label to the rest of them. Besides, it was from a previous agreement where I wanted to remove that poll, so we agreed to just put a warning label instead. 72.229.242.36 (talk) 04:51, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

72.229.242.36 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

While I don't use my account for editing, it more has to do with the fact that I don't want it anymore, and would rather edit anonymously than anything malicious. As I haven't caused any harmful edits whatsoever recently. However, I don't know how to do that and ended up ignoring my account as a result, and didn't intend to cause any harm in doing so. 72.229.242.36 (talk) 01:04, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You'll need to deal with this under your account. 331dot (talk) 08:25, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.