User talk:72.174.104.250

February 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Fat santa cat has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Fat santa cat was changed by 72.174.104.250 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.978847 on 2015-02-04T22:42:24+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:42, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Norway2, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

ToonLucas22 (talk) 22:56, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unhelpful edits to Fourteen Words

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Fourteen Words, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Rockypedia (talk) 12:44, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Whitewashing attempt of Robert Jay Mathews page

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Robert Jay Mathews. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Rockypedia (talk) 12:47, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Whitewashing appears to be covering up vice or crimes or trying to make unpleasant things appear more pleasant, for example, the usage of euphemisms. I am not whitewashing anything. The Order's goals are not White Supremacist but were White Separatist in nature, ie the establishment of a white homeland in the Pacific Northwestern region, namely in eastern Washington. David Lane was a White Nationalist and is regarded as such via the very title of him on Wikipedia. White Supremacist and White Nationalist and White Separatist are three differing ideologies. One involves an expressed race-hate, the other involves the identification of a national term for "white people" and the other refers to essentially territorial imperatives, or places in which only are for white people. Granted there may or may not be an overlapping between the three, but Separatist is not necessarily Supremacist and neither is White Nationalist. The term White Supremacist is used to refer inappropriately to anybody with some level of pro-white ideology and that is not only unfair, it is inaccurate in the bigger scheme of things and distinction should be made or else it leads to stereotypes. There is no white washing of crimes or vices, just distinction for greater clarification. Thanks for writing and have a great day.72.174.104.250 (talk) 23:42, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you have some reliable secondary sources that describe them as such, I would encourage you to list them here, and there's certainly a way to come to a consensus on how the description of The Order should read. I personally have found that the majority of reliable sources have described The Order's goals as white supremacist in nature, and I'd further submit that the terms "white pride" and "white nationalism" exist merely to provide a sanitized public face for white supremacy - and that's not an original thought by me; it's fairly well-documented. Rockypedia (talk) 03:26, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Righteous Branch of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has been reverted.
Your edit here to Righteous Branch of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://gospelfullness.wordpress.com/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 00:42, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

April 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to White genocide conspiracy theory, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Additionally, you are WP:EDITWARRING, and whitegenocideproject.com is not even close to a reliable source. Discuss your proposals on the article's talk page before restoring again. Grayfell (talk) 20:44, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on White genocide conspiracy theory. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 02:43, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.