User talk:7121989

Image:Sense.jpg

By the way, I would like to welcome you to the Wikipedia, and would ask that you review the following:

Also, if you have any questions, please feel free to post them on the Village pump or on my talk page. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. ^{Think out loud} 06:24, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Notes on Finding "Free" or "Fair Useable" images

In my experience, finding Fair Useable images consists of using Google's image search and weeding out photos given by it very, very carefully. Typically, if you look at fair use photos, you need to understand that using them is a sticky situation. Since there is no general rule regarding fair use, each one has to be justified. It would probably be easier to have Wikipedians seek out and take a photo of a porn actress, then release it under the GFDL or public domain-- unfortunately, we don't have that... right now.

When it comes to porn actresses, there are very few images that are "free" to use in Wikipedia. About 99% of them are under fair use. The following are considered fair use:

Magazine and DVD covers; images within the magazine are not fair usable
Promotional photos (I'll cover this later)
Screenshots from videos (movies and TV shows), games, software, and websites

The one thing that needs to be understood is that fair use photos are copyrighted. Also, copyrighted photos do not have to say they are copyrighted -- it is assumed, by default, that all photos are copyrighted.

Where Google search comes in: I first try and see whether or not the person has an official website. If so, it's easier to get a promotional photo from there. Basically, a promophoto is any photo that is used for promotional purposes, therefore anything in the "tour" or "preview" portion of the website is pretty much "guaranteed" to be fair useable. Something in the members section of a website, where people have to pay to access the content and agree to a "terms of service" agreement, would not constitute as fair use but as a violation of copyright. Plus it isn't promotional, so that portion of fair use is rendered null and void.

(By the way, I put guaranteed in quotes because someone can always contest fair useability.)

As for stars without an official site, I try to find something that doesn't come from a third party. Images from sites such as Tripod, BTInternet, Geocities or other "free" providers should not be used, simply because 95% of those images are probably used without permission and are not fair useable. (The reason those sites still exist is mainly because they are "small potatoes" that aren't worth the effort to pursue.) Avoid using photos from personal sites as well.

If you're really looking for a photo of someone, then you can get away with a magazine or DVD cover, as so long as it isn't explicit in nature (and as long as you provide critical commentary on the DVD or magazine itself).

As for what I look for in a photo:

Non-nudity. While Wikipedia isn't censored, nudity borders on unencyclopedic, unless we're dealing with an article on the vagina, where a non-pornographic photo would be encyclopedic. It is better to go with a picture of the person clothed.
No sex acts. Basically, as defined in the WikiProject Porn stars page, images of people depicted in sex acts are mainly unencyclopedic. This includes, but isn't limited to, photos of actresses performing fellatio or having semen on their faces.
No copyright notices on photo. Whenever possible, I avoid those with copyright notices on the photo, unless it falls under fair use (i.e. promotional photo).

Ultimately, if you find yourself questioning the source, the need, or copyright of a photo, it's best not to upload it. Period.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask more! Also, in refernece to porn stars, refer to Wikipedia:WikiProject Porn stars. This goes over most of the common stuff you'll come across when dealing with articles of a pornographic nature. Thanks! -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. ^{Think out loud} 19:52, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:PP5311618.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:PP5311618.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag, so its copyright status is therefore unclear. Please add a tag to let us know its copyright status. (If you created/took the picture then you can use {{gfdl}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{fairuse}}.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know on the image description page where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Otherwise, see Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have tagged them, too. Note that any unsourced and untagged imaged will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. --Evil Monkey∴Hello 02:53, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:ChrissyB041.jpg

File deletion warning

An image or media file you uploaded, Image:ChrissyB041.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Regarding your recent pictures

Hi there. I just noticed that you have begun adding pictures to pornographic performer's biographies. While I applaud your efforts and enthusiasm, I would advise against:

Adding more than one photo of the subject. (Ex: Susana Spears, which currently has more pictures than actual text content.)
Adding photos that contain blatant nudity. Yes, Wikipedia is not censored for the protection of minors but I cannot see what is served by uploading nude photos and adding them to the article as opposed to photos of the subject clothed.

The reason I bring this to your attention are due to the following facts:

Pictures should only serve to illustrate the person. (In other words, they should serve to put a face to a name.)
There really isn't any reason to add nude pictures. If people wanted to see these performers in the nude, a Google image search would bring up these pictures without a problem.
Of course, there is the issue of the 18 U.S.C. 2257. Since the recently amended laws to the 2257 are in effect, distributors are also responsible for keeping records of pictures that contain nudity and/or sexual situations. While IANAL, I would not wish to imperil the project simply to post a nude picture of a pornographic model on her respective article.
From a technical standpoint, there is the concern about bandwidth -- Wikipedia is financially supported by community donations. Speaking for myself, I would rather see the money go towards bandwidth for important text than a nude glamour photo that is, at minimum, 10 times the size of any text article.
From a copyright standpoint, some of the pictures you have added simply go beyond the borders of "fair use". Again, one picture is plenty and the picture should only be large enough to show the person. (For instance, you can crop the photo to remove the excess background and create a head shot, which would strengthen any fair use claim as it would not be the whole picture.)

If you have any questions, comments, or concerns, let me (or anyone else) know. Thank you! -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. ^{Think out loud} 04:38, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, I suggest that when you do upload new images, please do not use the same name for the new image as pre-existing images (such as your upload of Image:Penny Flame 1.jpg). Olessi 18:03, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Susana Spears.jpg has been listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Susana Spears.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Image:Susana Spears Lingerie.jpg has been listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Susana Spears Lingerie.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Image:Chrissy Moran.jpg has been listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Chrissy Moran.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Image:Mika_Tan.jpg has been listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Mika_Tan.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Image:Dfdfdf.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Dfdfdf.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Image:Barbara Moore.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Barbara Moore.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Image copyright problem with Image:Neckaralb.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Neckaralb.gif. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 20:16, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:USS_Porter_(DD-800).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:USS_Porter_(DD-800).jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 05:30, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Clara bow0006.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Clara bow0006.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Jkelly 21:52, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Greta Garbo Sex icon.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Greta Garbo Sex icon.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Jkelly 21:55, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice

I've blocked you indefinitely for continually misrepresenting the copyright status of images you upload. The {{promotional}} tag does not apply to random pornographic images, and asserting that an image found on Usenet is somehow free of copyright concerns is simply untrue. Image copyright is a concern on Wikipedia. You may request that this block be lifted, but you must pay much closer attention to copyright policies. Do not use Wikipedia as a porn repository. android 79 05:04, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Skagit.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Skagit.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 00:23, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Seven YEar Itch.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Seven YEar Itch.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:06, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Jean-Picker-Firstenberg.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Jean-Picker-Firstenberg.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 10:52, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Fantomette2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Fantomette2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:08, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Kradetzat na praskovi cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kradetzat na praskovi cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:53, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Skynet.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Skynet.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:31, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Skynet.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Skynet.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:53, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fernando Figueroa.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fernando Figueroa.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:36, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Alfonso Quiñónez Molina.jpg

The file File:Alfonso Quiñónez Molina.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]