User talk:71.91.45.233

January 2017

Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I noticed that in this edit to The Fat Boys, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 22:05, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

CAPTAIN RAJU, not an error--and you missed the fact that I did in fact leave an edit notice. No worries: I have restored the edit. Thanks for keeping Wikipedia clean, 71.91.45.233 (talk) 00:37, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that in this edit to Arazi Hasnal, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:29, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Q

Hello ! This is Yasir Yousaf, Can you please explain why the Notable persons on page "Mandrah" were removed on 24th jan 2017 ?

Yasir Yousaf, we include residents if they're notable enough to have an article on Wikipedia. Thank you. 71.91.45.233 (talk) 00:53, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Hello, I'm DoABarrelRoll.dev. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Cornhole— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DoABarrelRoll.dev(Constable of the WikiPolice) 04:19, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DoABarrelRoll.dev. Dude. Pay attention please. 71.91.45.233 (talk) 04:20, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

~~{{{1}}}~~

So sorry. Just getting usest to Huggle, so i'm going offline for now.DoABarrelRoll.dev(Constable of the WikiPolice) 04:25, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DoABarrelRoll.dev. You should look at what you're doing, and you should stop that irritating policey bit where you simply hit rollback. Editing here is a privilege, not a right. 71.91.45.233 (talk) 04:22, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK--but this is not about Huggle: it's about looking at what you revert. If you're tempted to hit rollback just by looking at recent changes, fight the urge. Thank you. 71.91.45.233 (talk) 04:26, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Genealogy

why does this matter? Since when is genealogy not important? ... Maybe for you!!, You from English origin?... Adopted? ... I think you should re-edit my edit (Juan Martín de Pueyrredón related to Pelliza family) you must study genealogy!... BYE BYE — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlbertCrespo1 (talk • contribs) 04:00, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AlbertCrespo1, "English origin"? "Adopted"? What kind of stupid questions are those? 71.91.45.233 (talk) 12:33, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OWNER OF WIKIPEDIA?

ARE YOU THE OWNER OF WIKIPEDIA?... Do you think that parochial archives are not a reliable source of information? That's like saying that god does not exist.. Maybe I am a rookie historian, but not a loser!! well you destroy my items but you know that you are an ignorant! ... You do not know anything about Argentina history BY AlbertCrespo1--AlbertCrespo1 (talk) 18:36, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I know that your archives aren't reliable secondary sources. I also know that Mano Genobili has another season in him, and that Maradona singlehandedly saved "Live Is Life". And no, I am not the owner of Wikipedia--just a caretaker. You can be one too, if you agree to play by the rules. 71.91.45.233 (talk) 00:05, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Let me clarify the site you say is not a secure source familysearch.org, belonging to FamilySearch, a genealogy organization of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and Genealogical Society of Utah, they have microfilmed millions of documents related to national census, baptisms, marriages and deaths, including the parish registers belonging to Buenos Aires, Argentina. The information provided by FamilySearch, is not only about genealogy, but about history. Since it gives us data that has not been published in books

You can not say that the sacred act of a baptism is not a reliable source of information. by--AlbertCrespo1 (talk) 19:13, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fo shizzle? That makes no sense at all. 71.91.45.233 (talk) 00:30, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.