User talk:71.81.58.55

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 71.81.58.55, is registered to Charter Communications and may be shared by multiple users, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators or other parties wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create an account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

Create new pages and rename pages
Edit semi-protected pages
Upload images
Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

If you edit without an account, your IP address (71.81.58.55) is used to identify you instead.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! Oripaypaykim (talk) 12:06, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Someone using this IP address, 71.81.58.55, has made edits, which do not conform to our policies and therefore have been reverted. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider getting a username to avoid confusion with other editors.

You don't have to log in to read or edit pages on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

Some good links for newcomers are:

Help contents – the main help page.
Quick guide – a "cheatsheet" listing the main editing commands.
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! Musdan77 (talk) 17:10, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Lord of the Rings (film series), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mlpearc (open channel) 21:15, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to The Lord of the Rings (film series). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mlpearc (open channel) 21:44, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Look for yourself ?

Please familiarize yourself with WP:BURDEN. Mlpearc (open channel) 21:57, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Hello, I'm Non-dropframe. I noticed that you made a change to an article, SpongeBob SquarePants (season 9), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --Non-Dropframe _talk 22:57, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Finding Dory does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! RunnyAmiga (talk) 21:41, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 13 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the List of SpongeBob SquarePants guest stars page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Hello, I'm Betty Logan. Your recent edit to the page List of highest-grossing openings for films appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Betty Logan (talk) 18:01, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

Edit warring at Captain America: Civil War

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:41, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Apologize and unblock reason

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

71.81.58.55 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was upset when no one updated the page. I was trying to help and I forgot to provide cites and sources to it. I promise to respect that, What I did was inappropriate and I swear I promise I will never do it again.

Decline reason:

Given your responses here, which I have read despite them being blanked, I believe that you should really take a break from Wikipedia until you are able to edit in a more mature and civil fashion. Unblocking you now would likely result in more disruption.Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:23, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

EdJohnston, are you listening to me? I really really mean it! What I did was wrong and I promise I will never do it again.

I am declining to lift your block, but another admin is welcome to consider it. You should restore the explanation I left which was supposed to be helpful to other reviewing admins. If you don't use this page for good faith unblock requests I can disable your access to it. EdJohnston (talk) 16:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Since you removed Ponyo's decline of your unblock request, I'm disabling your talk page. Use WP:UTRS if you would like further review of your block. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 22:53, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Zootopia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Given your history, I would hope you would know better than to reinsert unsourced material and revert other edits without providing an edit summary. DonIago (talk) 04:42, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2017

Hello, I'm Doniago. Your recent edit to the page Zootopia appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 19:31, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please don't add information without providing sources, and please don't add information that is of limited interest. This is a general encyclopedia, not a compendium of film grosses, and listing the order in which films reached $1 billion is outside the scope of Wikipedia. Thanks. Trivialist (talk) 02:33, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's been here for a while and people need to know the order of films that reach $1 billion. It's been around here for a while so you should be the one not to undo those edits.

If "people need to know the order of films that reach $1 billion," they can consult a site like Box Office Mojo, but I think you're assuming that everyone will be as interested in such details as you are.

Also, regarding your comment on this edit, trivia is generally not useful; that's what makes it trivia. And you still haven't provided any sources for your information. Trivialist (talk) 02:39, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well the main part of the ranking of highest-grossing films don't have sources I looked at most of them. So therefore this information is good.

Huh? Trivialist (talk) 02:47, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I noticed that right as you stopped editing, User:2600:100D:B107:BD0A:4009:A16B:1DF:1327 picked up where you left off. You should know that abusing multiple accounts is against Wikipedia rules. Trivialist (talk) 03:01, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea what you're talking about. I do not have a sock puppet account. And I'm offended by this accusation. I'm done having this argument. Good day.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.