User talk:69.112.128.69

Welcome to Wikipedia. But respectfully, you're mistaken about a few things. Claiming the film can't be a response to the Lewinsky scandal is like saying The Crucible can't be an allegory for McCarthyism because there's nothing about communism in it, it's not set in the 1950s, or there were no witches brought before US Congress in the 1950s. But The Crucible is the most notable allegory for McCarthyism. Anyone old enough to remember the Clinton years (I am) will instantly tell the similarities between the discourse then and the issues that are in the film; Bridges referred to the response as "unveiled". Second, there are plenty of sources about the Oldman controversy; the controversy is what's documented and it was a big deal at the time. Also, six messages on my user talk page about this is a bit much. Thanks, Ribbet32 (talk) 00:27, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Hello, I'm WikiLinuz. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Cultural appropriation, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. WikiLinuz🍁(talk) 01:36, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.