Jump to content

User talk:67.175.224.138

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the ones you made to Wikipedia:Reference desk/Science. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a certain number of days and made a certain number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (67.175.224.138) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! Balkywrest (talk) 11:05, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, 67.175.224.138. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Reference desk/Science.
Message added 11:08, 8 January 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Balkywrest (talk) 11:08, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Answered your questions on Computing desk, letting you know because it's been several days since you asked them. 93.136.155.134 (talk) 01:02, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

[edit]
Hello heres a cup of tea for you! Enjoy! Neomorph Xenomorph 05:13, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Your posts at Science Reference Desk

[edit]

Warning: These posts [1] [2] [3] [4] are repetitious claims to "know something" that are irrelevant to the section, they display a refusal to accept the answer and advice given, and instead they attempt to pursue a debate which is selfish behaviour against the standing rules at the Ref. Desks. You are welcome to place questions properly at the Ref. Desks either as an unregistered IP user or after registering a Wikipedia account, which is recommended. DroneB (talk) 13:41, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:22, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

67.175.224.138 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I wasn't being disruptive, I was merely asking science questions (in the May 25 Digestion section of Science Desk). Though an admin did get me to re-ask all my questions 1 by 1 to make me re-state them (look like an idiot) to get me banned, I was still being sincere from re-asking my questions, about the energy conversion to speed of light. Anyways this "I wasn't being disruptive" was the original ban reason, 2 minutes later the banning-admin changed it to "using Wikipedia as a discussion forum," and I can certainly talk about that. Though asking sincere questions is still mutual exclusive from using Wikipedia as a discussion forum. 67.175.224.138 (talk) 16:58, 25 November 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Decline reason:

I think it's for the best that you take a break from the Reference desk. Once you establish a track record of editing the encyclopedia, you can request an unblock. PhilKnight (talk) 17:42, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


Weird, I'm gonna say something that doesn't bring me up in any way, but to bring someone else down. It won't help my situation in any way. I feel like I'm only doing it because I'm emotionally hurt. But I think Baseball Bugs have said more off things then I have in the science desk. Sheesh. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Science/2010_January_21#Orgasm 67.175.224.138 (talk) 00:46, 29 May 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Hello, 67.175.224.138. You have new messages at MelanieN's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Posting comments on behalf of Filter-blocked user

[edit]

The following was attempted to be posted here by User:67.165.185.178, who claims to be the same IP. These edits were blocked by the edit filter which prevents IPs from editing other IPs talk pages. As this appears to be directly related to their ban, I am posting here on their behalf, without other comment or opinion on the merits. Please reply to the IP and not to me. CrowCaw 14:19, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

:Ping to @PhilKnight: (the appealing admin). @ToBeFree: (the banning admin), and @Baseball Bugs: (the admin that got me banned). 2 more months before my Reference Desk ban ends. I want to clear something up. I know I have used Wikipedia as a talk discussion on other people's pages, and I feel that that is the true reason why I was banned, rather than at the Science Desk. I need to clear something up. I saw gang pages were being vandalized, and when they were, they included real-names. Which caused me to post on their talk pages. To summarize: outside of Wikipedia I happen to work hours on gang activity on-line, and 1 thing we really like are snitches. Snitches who post as fake accounts, and therefore give critical information against gangs. I happen to work with FOIA law with law offices, where we submit the real names to police in order to get their mugshots. But the police don't give us mugshots if we don't have their "real name." So when fake accounts on Wikipedia vandalized the gang pages with real names that get reverted, I posted on their talk page to try to gather more (which my talk-page posts were later reverted by ToBeFree). (It just so happens I was able to verify the real names in the local computer system for court cases, and submit that to FOIA requests to my local police department, so I will be getting a mugshot thanks to a vandal on Wikipedia). Now, I would never expect you Wikipedia admins to understand this, but I hope it provides feedback that I was not trolling. Snitches are a real find on the Internet, (though I understand this type of snitching did not benefit Wikipedia). Some of my other posts to other people's talk pages were purely conversation for personal use, and I apologize for that.

I always want to make an apology to @Jayron32:, who heavily took offense to my "what do Republicans do if they're unemployed, and can't find employment." I would never expect you to understand this either, but I do often get heavily insulted by Republicans in non-Wikipedia social media, for being unemployed. You know, a "Democratic lowlife" or whatever, I didn't expect such a question to face such backlash, and I'm sure he was very close to deleting the whole convo.

2 more months before my Reference Desk ban is up, but I realize now my IP address is different, I want to claim to be the same IP, and using my 1st edit to do so, is there anyway to merge the 2 accounts?. Regards, 67.165.185.178.

Quote ends, Thanks, CrowCaw 14:19, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Test. 67.165.185.178 (talk) 14:30, 10 March 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Yes, thank you all, I believe I could not post because I could not 'ping' the admins. Thank you for that, the admins can reply to me here. 67.165.185.178 (talk) 14:33, 10 March 2021 (UTC).[reply]
  • I'm afraid I only have a vague recollection of the conversation in question; I don't recall being personally offended (I'm not affiliated with the U.S. Republican Party myself), but I do remember the comments as showing a naive understanding of the nuances of U.S. politics in some way (again, without recalling the specifics). I don't recall being involved in any discussions or requests or anything that led specifically to you're being banned, so I have little to contribute one way or the other their. It appears you were repeatedly warned about violating well-published conventions at the reference desks, so when your ban expires, it would be well-advised if you don't return to that again. Otherwise, I am not exactly sure what I can contribute to the discussion, but I will happy to answer any questions and/or elaborate on anything if anyone wants to remind me more about any prior involvement with this case I may have forgotten (diffs are nice!). Good luck and vaya con dios. --Jayron32 14:55, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ping to @PhilKnight: (the appealing admin). My ban expired 13 days ago, right, but yet I'm still reported to the Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism. 67.165.185.178 (talk) 14:27, 8 June 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Ping to @ToBeFree: also. 67.165.185.178 (talk) 14:31, 8 June 2021 (UTC).[reply]
I have read this message. If I understand correctly, no action is currently requested from me. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:18, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:67.175.224.138&oldid=1027563783"