User talk:666hopedieslast

VOTE OPPOSE!

No signs that the Arbitration Committee is in any form willing to change for the better (as expected).

For years we have been complaining about anchoring, about railroading, about bias. When someone comes before ArbCom, ArbCom has to sanction, no matter how feeble the evidence is. They do not care to properly present the evidence that they make decisions on. They do not care whether the editor has been trying to improve since. And when an editor comes again in front of ArbCom, they will just increase the sanctions - they have been here before so they must be guilty.

It is becoming more and more clear that there is no will, nor possibility to improve.¹ This institute should be abandoned - NOW

RE:Discussion - plot to assassinate President Bush

666hopedieslast: please stop reinserting reverted text to Security incidents involving George W. Bush. Your initial edit has been reverted multiple times, and you should now desist and work things out collaboratively through discussion on the talk page. Please be aware that restoring your original edit multiple times while refusing to engage in a discussion about its removal on the article's talk page may be seen as disruptive. Please engage in a talk page discussion on how this plot may or may not fall within the parameters of this article. Drdpw (talk) 20:23, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Patrick Lancaster for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Patrick Lancaster is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Lancaster until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Netherzone (talk) 17:45, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary Sanctions Notification

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

EvergreenFir (talk) 19:22, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi 666hopedieslast! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Edit warring on a draft article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:07, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What is your old account?

What is your old account? You probably need to inform the admins (not sure of the procedure) so as not to be blocked for socking. (Apologies to Ermenrich for plagiarizing his question). Wes sideman (talk) 10:51, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Alina Lipp

Hello, 666hopedieslast. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alina Lipp, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Alina Lipp

Hello, 666hopedieslast. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Alina Lipp".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 14:09, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]