User talk:66.7.95.2

Vandalism to Horcrux

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Horcrux, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Your changes have been automatically reverted by CounterVandalismBot. If this is a mistake, please report it. Thank you. CounterVandalismBot 12:01, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Great Expectations has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —αἰτίας •discussion• 21:35, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Great Expectations constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. · AndonicO ^Hail! 21:37, 28 January 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Great Expectations. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. · AndonicO ^Hail! 21:38, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Rain shadow. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. CaptainDDL (talk) 14:33, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

You have been blocked for a period of 24 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. — Aitias // discussion 14:46, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Hello, I'm Oddbodz. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Brearley School, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Oddbodz - (Talk) (Contribs) 14:01, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Brearley School with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Oddbodz - (Talk) (Contribs) 14:02, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Brearley School with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Oddbodz - (Talk) (Contribs) 14:02, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Brearley School. Oddbodz - (Talk) (Contribs) 14:03, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 14:05, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, I'm Nick Levine. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Reverse osmosis because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Nick Levine (talk) 13:57, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Reverse osmosis with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | ~ 13:58, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Hello, I'm Kinetic37. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Nataraja— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Kinetic37 (talk) 17:54, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.