Jump to content

User talk:66.213.97.2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm Racerx11. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Mood ring, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, RacerX11 Talk to meStalk me 23:32, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock this shared IP

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

66.213.97.2 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This IP belongs to a public library. Had Alex Bakharev done any sort of work when making this block, that would have been apparent.

Accept reason:

This IP was not blocked directly, it was caught in an autoblock when a disruptive user was blocked for vandalising Wikipedia. The blocking admin had no access to the registered account's IP information and therefore would not have known that they were using a library IP to carry out their disruption. I have now lifted the autoblock. Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 17:30, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can tell, the user that was blocked made a single edit that was considered vandalism. To me, it looks like the test edits of a child. They even specifically asked for help, not once but twice.

At any rate, if our default practice is to autoblock an IP without checking who the IP belongs to after that user has been warned exactly one time, perhaps it's time to review that process. If it's not Alex's fault, then there's obviously a problem with the system in place. Shoot first and ask questions later with indefinite blocks is not at all acceptable and that's ignoring that the account was labeled as "Vandalism only". Please, someone tell me that the account vandalized in deleted edits or I'm going to have to run this up the flag pole. 66.213.97.2 (talk) 17:45, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/macha wacha university, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:29, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 66.213.97.2. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "macha wacha university".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/macha wacha university}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:40, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Yutsi. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Charles Webb (author) has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ❤ Yutsi Talk/ Edits 00:04, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2016

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Ronaz. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Bristlecone pine have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ronazTalk! 19:44, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2019

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Systems science has been reverted.
Your edit here to Systems science was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.issk.org (redirects to sites.google.com/view/issk)) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 02:58, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.