Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been removed or reverted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Stephenb (Talk)13:53, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for experimenting with the page Boston Tea Party on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Drumsac15:09, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! Drumsac15:12, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. The block is for a period of 24 hours. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. If you are collateral damage of this block, e-mail me and I'll review. Meanwhile, please talk to your network administrator about local measures to control vandalism of Wikipedia. --Nlu (talk) 15:19, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. -- Francs200012:40, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
You have recently vandalized a Wikipedia article, and you are now being asked to stop this type of behavior. You're welcome to continue editing Wikipedia, so long as these edits are constructive. Please see Wikipedia's Blocking policy and what constitutes vandalism; such actions are not tolerated on Wikipedia, and are not taken lightly.
We hope that you may become a legitimate editor and create an account. Again you are welcome to Wikipedia, but remember not to vandalize or you will soon be blocked from editing.
To add to what my colleague said, You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Johnleemk | Talk17:17, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Mexico, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. -- ( drini's page☎ ) 18:33, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires.Take a break. -- ( drini's page☎ ) 18:36, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text, deliberate misinformation, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you believe you have been blocked unfairly, please add the text {{unblock}} to this page, along with an explanation of why you believe you were unfairly blocked. An administrator will review your case. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Vsmith17:20, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text, deliberate misinformation, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. --cj | talk16:03, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for experimenting with the page George Steinbrenner on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. ikh (talk) 13:14, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent edit to Ivan IV of Russia was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot213:38, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Ivan IV of Russia, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. Big Jock Knew13:47, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
As you already might know, your edition of Hades is considered vandalism. You are invited to make all sort of contributions that might improve Wikipedia. But it would be a disconsideration with all the wikipedian comunity to vandalise an article. --Francisco Valverde15:36, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. gwernol 13:51, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. You have been blocked for one hour.--Adam(talk)13:59, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Bluetooth. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Srikeit(talk ¦ ✉)15:22, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent edit to Mushroom was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot214:15, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
12:37, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
12:40, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
(talk) 13:59, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
Srikeit(talk ¦ ✉) 15:22, 20 April 2006 (UTC)