User talk:64.53.113.2

February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Annabel Lee, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Midnightdreary (talk) 02:01, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Scoliosis has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Calabraxthis^(talk) 21:20, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Laundry detergent, you will be blocked from editing. Terrillja _talk 20:37, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

May 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Emperor Jimmu has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Tommy2010 22:55, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Emperor Jimmu. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Tommy2010 22:57, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Hello, I'm Fraggle81. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to The Fire Within (novel) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Fraggle81 (talk) 02:15, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2015

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Breadwinners (TV series). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Diff: [1] Not your job to summarize all critical response. That's the job of critical response aggregators like Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:24, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. The warning was placed in January about original research over critical reception, and now it's happening again to several other articles, including exactly the same reverted edits made in November 2014. Many of your edits like "mixed to negative" are meaningless, so please stop making statements like that. Just please learn how to handle the content you're doing and be 100% sure that it's 100% necessary before editing again. — Smuckola (Email) (Talk) 01:09, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2016

Hello, I'm KylieTastic. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Gideon v. Wainwright— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. KylieTastic (talk) 21:12, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Hello, I'm WindTempos. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Franz Hartmann have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. WindTempos ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:46, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.