User talk:62.254.111.116

New messages will appear at the bottom of this page.

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 62.254.111.116, is registered to Kilmarnock Sheriff Court and may be shared by multiple users, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators or other parties wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create an account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

Create new pages and rename pages
Edit semi-protected pages
Upload images
Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

If you edit without an account, your IP address (62.254.111.116) is used to identify you instead.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! BracketBot (talk) 15:14, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to National Vocational Qualification may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[[Category:Vocational education in the United

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:14, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

I am reverting all your replacements of UK flags with Scottish flags. A nice exercise, but not supported by our policies.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:17, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:SOVEREIGNFLAG, it is crystal clear.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:57, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I do not agree with 'your' changes to mine, as the constituent parts of the UK (England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland are devolved). Towns and councils come under devolved administration (devolved parliaments in each case), so please stop changing these flags back to the UK flag.

I am sorry that you disagree with me but our policies (specifically WP:SOVEREIGNFLAG) support my point of view.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:06, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki need to review its 'outdated' policies in relation to 'devolved issues' relating to the constituent parts of the UK (pre 1997).

Council matters (including towns) are now devolved. Devolved areas should have their respective national flags. However, the UK 'still' has control over such matters as Defence, and Foreign Affairs.

Once Wiki have reviewed, and changed its outdated flags policy, then with regard to twin towns, then change the flags back to the way they were, when I 'corrected' them.

You are welcome to start an request for comments at Wikipedia:Village Pump (policy) about an amendment of the policy. May be the community would agree with you, and the policy can be changed as a result. I do not have any opinion on the matter, and consequently I have no interest in changing the existing policy, I merely implement it. If it gets changed, I will implement the new policy.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:45, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for your welcome comments re the above. I am glad that you hold no views either way. This would make you a good candidate to perhaps chair such a Wiki review with a 'balanced view' on the issue, with other Wiki senior members. I have no knowledge about 'the process' of suggesting any changes to this policy on 'twin towns.' With regard to the UK, I feel that the 'key issue' would be what 'is' devolved, and what is 'not' devolved. Perhaps this would make a good starting point on deciding which flag to use. It would also be very progressive in its approach! With regard to twin towns, I did read an online news item some time ago about the Scottish Parliament trying to 'encourage' more Scottish towns / cities to twin with other towns and cities in other countries. Although their plans were met with mixed success! Please note, that there are 'also' twin town links with constituent parts of the UK. For example; Dudley (England) is twinned with Fort William (Scotland). The references I found for this twinning I found very interesting, which I added in the wiki twin towns web page (which had none previously).

At the end of last year, I tried to add a bit of colour to the UK twin towns by adding flags. Before this, the web pages looked dull and boring! One of your co wiki members deleted these initially, but then relented, providing I added some references to the twin towns. So, I did a lot of work trying to get references to back up those on the twin towns in the Scotland web page, which had less twin towns than England, so would be easier to do. So most of the twin towns shown 'did' actually have good references, which I added (but it took me a lot of time and effort!). Although, some are news articles, these may become dead links in the future, so will need to be reviewed occasionally. If you look at the Scotland twin towns web page, you will notice that there are many references, but on other pages in many other parts of the world there are very few! Many thanks once again for listening to my comments and views.

Sure. I am not sure I would be useful to chair anyting (an in any case, in Wikipedia there is no such notion as chaitring discussions), but you can just open a new topic at Wikipedia:Village Pump (policy), briefly explain your views there and see what others would say.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:42, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Hello, I'm Home Lander. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Tuba City, Arizona, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Home Lander (talk) 14:02, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2019

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Glenn Danzig, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Orville1974 (talk) 18:51, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. N.J.A. | talk 18:51, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

August 2019

Hello, I'm MelbourneStar. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Greyhills Academy High School, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 17:49, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm SpicyMilkBoy. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Greyhills Academy High School, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 00:47, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2021

Hello, I'm JPxG. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Adrenochrome, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. jp×g 04:51, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Adrenochrome. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. jp×g 04:52, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Adrenochrome, you may be blocked from editing. jp×g 04:52, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. jp×g 04:53, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2021

Hello, I'm Denisarona. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Giraffe seahorse have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Denisarona (talk) 13:04, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.