Jump to content

User talk:59.101.157.223

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this IP address, 59.101.157.223, has made unconstructive edits, which have been reverted. If you did this, in the future please try to contribute in a more constructive manner. If you'd like to experiment with the syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider getting a username to avoid confusion with other editors.

You don't have to log in to read or edit pages on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

Some good links for newcomers are:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! CatcherStorm talk 12:24, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Three things - First, leave the list of Australia pro wrestling organisations alone. It is consistent with other lists divided up and it stays that way. Second, do not claim Wrestle Rampage held the biggest show in Australian wrestling history without reliable independent proof. Global Warning drew more than 56,000 and it doesn't matter that it was WWE. It was held in Australia, therefore it's the biggest show in Australian wrestling history, like it or not. The old Adelaide Arena doesn't hold anywhere near that amount, and what was the final attendance and takings anyway? You never mentioned that did you? Third, stop using your IP as a sock, Pidzz. Log in and own your edits. What you are doing is in violation of WP:SOCK and will get you blocked for sure if you persist. Mega Z090 (talk) 21:46, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for using multiple IPs to edit Wikipedia.. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mkdwtalk 20:38, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.


See also

[edit]

Is only to linked existing items, please do not re-instate WP:REDLINKS to see also sections of articles, thank you JarrahTree 12:03, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do not exist, and unless you are about to create them amidst your filling up golf articles with large tables with nothing in them, it is better to add them, after they have been created. JarrahTree 12:11, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Popcat

[edit]

Please don't remove {{popcat}} from clearly underpopulated categories. Consider how many articles a category to apply to. For example, with Category:Rabbis from Illinois, are there likely to be articles on more than the 11 Illinois rabbis in the category? Similarly, are there likely to be more articles on radio stations in Ukraine than the ten articles in Category:Radio stations in Ukraine? If the answer is yes (which, in these cases, it clearly is - there could be dozens of articles on rabbis from Chicago alone, and a country of 45 million people will have many radio stations) don't remove the template - it is a useful tool for categorisers seeking work to do. Grutness...wha? 23:19, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to remove popcat from categories such as Category:Poets from Arizona, I will have no alternativer than to regard it as disruptive editing. Please stop. Grutness...wha? 23:52, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dolphin Surf Craft for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dolphin Surf Craft is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dolphin Surf Craft until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.