Jump to content

User talk:52714Number

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

What is a sock?

[edit]

A suspected sock or sockpuppet is someone who behaves in a way that looks as if it is not a new account. For example a brand-new account entering an existing edit-war about the nationality of Nicholas Leonicus Thomaeus looks like someone with another account who created an alternate account to keep edit-warring and to avoid WP:SCRUTINY. Most of the sock accounts also use personal attacks and other uncivil methods. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 00:20, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see. No, this is my only account in wikipedia. I understand that perhaps a lot of people edit wikipedia, so that's why the reverts are quick. 52714Number (talk) 12:55, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

52714Number, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi 52714Number! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Worm That Turned (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:20, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! 220 of Borg 23:56, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ghica family

[edit]

I saw that you have made some edits at "Ghica family" article.Can you use non-romanian reliable+neutral references? Also Observator Cultural is a romanian magazine so it's not reliable at this case.Provide us some non-romanian references as it says :"The family's origins are not clear and there isn't yet a CONCENSUS among scholars"Can you give us the name of these scholars(not romanian)?Rolandi+ (talk) 08:47, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]