User talk:5225C/2021/June
List of SailGP Teams Draft
[edit]Hey there! I've been editing the SailGP page recently. I've noticed that you have a draft list article on SailGP teams: [[1]]; I've just added full team information for the SailGP 2019, 2020, and 2021-22 rosters. Just letting you know as this might be of use to you. Thanks! NixV (talk) 02:07, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Sorry, me again. Just had to edit the last message as it didn't work out - I'm still learning Wikipedia as I'm pretty new to this. NixV (talk) 02:09, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- @NixV: Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm thinking that past rosters might be better suited to the Draft:List of SailGP teams rather than the overall article, since the main article should be focussed on the sport as a whole. The struggle I had with writing that draft is proving notability. Because of WP:INDISCRIMINATE we can't really have articles that consist solely of data without some sort of justification of its notability. Combining the two could be a step in the right direction towards bulking out the article into something more substantial. Would you be happy to merge those sections with the draft list to make a more comprehensive article on the teams and rosters?
5225C (talk • contributions) 11:23, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'd be absolutely up for that - it seems like a great idea. It'll definitely clean up the main article as well. That being said, I propose keeping current team rosters and their footnotes in the main article until the next season as it's relevant enough information. :) NixV (talk) 11:29, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- That makes sense to me.
5225C (talk • contributions) 11:31, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- That makes sense to me.
- Yeah, I'd be absolutely up for that - it seems like a great idea. It'll definitely clean up the main article as well. That being said, I propose keeping current team rosters and their footnotes in the main article until the next season as it's relevant enough information. :) NixV (talk) 11:29, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – June 2021
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2021).
- Ashleyyoursmile • Less Unless
- Husond • MattWade • MJCdetroit • Carioca • Vague Rant • Kingboyk • Thunderboltz • Gwen Gale • AniMate • SlimVirgin (deceased)
- Consensus was reached to deprecate Wikipedia:Editor assistance.
- Following a Request for Comment the Book namespace was deprecated.
- Wikimedia previously used the IRC network Freenode. However, due to changes over who controlled the network with reports of a forceful takeover by several ex-staff members, the Wikimedia IRC Group Contacts decided to move to the new Libera Chat network. It has been reported that Wikimedia related channels on Freenode have been forcibly taken over if they pointed members to Libera. There is a migration guide and Wikimedia discussions about this.
- After a Clarification request, the Arbitration Committee modified Remedy 5 of the Antisemitism in Poland case. This means sourcing expectations are a discretionary sanction instead of being present on all articles. It also details using the talk page or the Reliable Sources Noticeboard to discuss disputed sources.
Editing news 2021 #2
[edit]Read this in another language • Subscription list for this newsletter
Earlier this year, the Editing team ran a large study of the Reply Tool. The main goal was to find out whether the Reply Tool helped newer editors communicate on wiki. The second goal was to see whether the comments that newer editors made using the tool needed to be reverted more frequently than comments newer editors made with the existing wikitext page editor.
The key results were:
- Newer editors who had automatic ("default on") access to the Reply tool were more likely to post a comment on a talk page.
- The comments that newer editors made with the Reply Tool were also less likely to be reverted than the comments that newer editors made with page editing.
These results give the Editing team confidence that the tool is helpful.
Looking ahead
The team is planning to make the Reply tool available to everyone as an opt-out preference in the coming months. This has already happened at the Arabic, Czech, and Hungarian Wikipedias.
The next step is to resolve a technical challenge. Then, they will deploy the Reply tool first to the Wikipedias that participated in the study. After that, they will deploy it, in stages, to the other Wikipedias and all WMF-hosted wikis.
You can turn on "Discussion Tools" in Beta Features now. After you get the Reply tool, you can change your preferences at any time in Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion.
00:27, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 June 2021
[edit]- News and notes: Elections, Wikimania, masking and more
- In the media: Boris and Joe, reliability, love, and money
- Disinformation report: Croatian Wikipedia: capture and release
- Recent research: Feminist critique of Wikipedia's epistemology, Black Americans vastly underrepresented among editors, Wiki Workshop report
- Traffic report: So no one told you life was gonna be this way
- News from the WMF: Searching for Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: WikiProject on open proxies interview
- Forum: Is WMF fundraising abusive?
- Discussion report: Reliability of WikiLeaks discussed
- Obituary: SarahSV
ANI notice
[edit] There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
SSSB (talk) 12:45, 30 June 2021 (UTC)