Jump to content

User talk:5126CricketStore

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, 5126CricketStore, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Christopher Kraus (talk) 19:56, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

[edit]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Cricket Communications, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cricket_Communications&diff=279215792&oldid=279214003 Removed Links; Very Similar to what User:63.214.184.6 did at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cricket_Communications&diff=279211653&oldid=279195664 Christopher Kraus (talk) 19:57, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Cricket Communications, you will be blocked from editing. Removed Links with no issue @ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cricket_Communications&diff=279216896&oldid=279215888 Christopher Kraus (talk) 20:02, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

I didn't see a edit description when you removed those 3 links - What is the issue with the links?--Christopher Kraus (talk) 20:16, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Those links are not reciprocated on the other parties 'See Also' links. I am only looking for neutrality. One sided and blatant advertising is unwelcomed.5126CricketStore (talk) 20:35, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't really blatent advertising, Pocket, Revol, and Metro are similar companies.--Christopher Kraus (talk) 00:13, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Cricket Communications, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
  4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. RadioFan2 (talk) 02:46, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This account, 5126CricketStore, has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia, because your username is the name of a business, and "role accounts" are not permitted here.
This is often not a reflection on the user, and you are encouraged to choose a new account name which does meet our guidelines and are invited to contribute to Wikipedia under an appropriate username. If you feel this block was made in error, you may quickly and easily appeal it—see below.

Our username policy provides guidance on selecting your username. In brief, usernames should not be offensive, disruptive, promotional, related to a 'real-world' group or organization, or misleading. Also, usernames may not end with the string "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

If you have already made edits and wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name you may request a change in username. To do so, please follow these directions:

  1. Add {{unblock-un|your new username here}} below. This is possible because even when you are blocked, you can still edit your own talk page.
  2. At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
  3. Please note, you may only request a name that is not already in use. The account is created upon acceptance – do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change since we can far more easily allocate your new name to you, if it is not yet used. Usernames that have already been taken are listed here. For more information, please visit Wikipedia:Changing username.
  4. In the alternative, you can "abandon" the contributions under this username and create a new account, which is much faster and easier.
Last, the automated software systems that prevent vandalism may have been activated, which can cause new account creation to be blocked also. If you have not acted in a deliberately inappropriate manner, please let us know if this happens, and we will deactivate the block as soon as possible. You may also appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below or emailing the administrator who blocked you.

--Orange Mike | Talk 13:07, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]