User talk:4th-otaku
|
Fastflow
[edit]Hi 4th! I saw you edited the Fastflow (computing) article, and wondered if you might be able to give me an opinon as to its value for Wikipedia. The article was created by M. Aldinucci, a computer science professor in Italy, and one of the two authors of the library. He also added information about Fastflow to perhaps 20 -30 other comp. sci. articles on Wikipedia. He obviously has a conflict of interest. I see from sourceforge that it gets something like 100 or more downloads per month, which seems impressive. But on the other hand, it's not "notable" in Wikipedia's sense. Only a single paper has been presented about it, at an IEEE mini-conference last year. So basically, I'm asking whether you have the background to render an opinon about its suitability for Wikipedia. Was its creator just engaging in self-promotional spamming, or does the article's presence here actually benefit the encyclopedia? I'd be grateful for an independent opinion. Other editors urged me to seek to have all of Aldinucci's edits ( every one of which was to promote his work, Fastflow ) reverted and this article deleted when I discovered his COI last year, but I've been reluctant to pursue that, not knowing if the article and the information the author inserted about Fastflow into other pages is beneficial or not. Can you give me some idea as to its value? I'd be grateful. You can reply just below, btw; I'll put this page on my watchlist. Thanks, – OhioStandard (talk) 11:04, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
Sorry, I'm not an expert in the field. Not a C++ programmer either. So, I cannot evaluate the notabilty. I'm generally an inclusionist here; if the COI author has been properly warned and do not make any spam/COI edits further, the article is okay to stay for me. --4th-otaku (talk) 03:36, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
- Okay; thanks anyway. And thanks for correcting my usage of "Fastflow" re disambiguation, too. Best, – OhioStandard (talk) 06:27, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
Lua in Worms Armageddon
[edit]Hi, do you remember why did you add Category:Lua-scripted video games to Worms Armageddon in this edit? I'm not aware of any version which ever used Lua - the PC versions certainly didn't. I've undone your change for now. Thanks. --Vladimir (talk) 17:20, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for your correction. It's listed in the ru:Lua article, so I've tried it. I will add a ru-version of {{citation needed}} there. --4th-otaku (talk) 19:17, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 22:54, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
Lua thanks
[edit]
Cybercobra has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!
I'd just like to thank you for doing a great job at the otherwise thankless task of policing the lists on Lua (programming language). --Cybercobra (talk) 11:58, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
Barnstar
[edit]
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation. |
Copyright problem
[edit]Hello. I see that in December of 2011, you seem to have expanded the article List of potential habitable exoplanets with content that seems to have been copied from [1]. Clearly the page predates us, since it was already cited as a source in the article.
I'm afraid that this content is likely to be deleted, as the license for that website is not compatible with our own. We license our content under Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike. Their license is "Non-Commercial." Since our own content is licensed for commercial reuse, we cannot take material that is non-commercial.
If the license had been compatible, we would be able to retain it, but only if you acknowledged your source. Please see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for how this is done.
For more about copyright on Wikipedia, please see Wikipedia:Copy-paste. For information on what licenses are compatible, see WP:COMPLIC.
If you have any questions, please feel free to come by my talk page. Thanks. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:20, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
Article Feedback deployment
[edit]Hey 4th-otaku; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:35, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
File:Kepler Project logo.gif missing description details
[edit]
is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:10, 30 July 2013 (UTC)Article Feedback Tool update
[edit]Hey 4th-otaku. I'm contacting you because you're involved in the Article Feedback Tool in some way, either as a previous newsletter recipient or as an active user of the system. As you might have heard, a user recently anonymously disabled the feedback tool on 2,000 pages. We were unable to track or prevent this due to the lack of logging feature in AFT5. We're deeply sorry for this, as we know that quite a few users found the software very useful, and were using it on their articles.
We've now re-released the software, with the addition of a logging feature and restrictions on the ability to disable. Obviously, we're not going to automatically re-enable it on each article—we don't want to create a situation where it was enabled by users who have now moved on, and feedback would sit there unattended—but if you're interested in enabling it for your articles, it's pretty simple to do. Just go to the article you want to enable it on, click the "request feedback" link in the toolbox in the sidebar, and AFT5 will be enabled for that article.
Again, we're very sorry about this issue; hopefully it'll be smooth sailing after this :). If you have any questions, just drop them at the talkpage. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) 21:46, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 29
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Elias, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ilya. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 2
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited VDPAU, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Intel graphics. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, 4th-otaku. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
The file File:Kepler Project logo.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 05:06, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Category:Ripple payment network has been nominated for deletion
[edit]
Category:Ripple payment network has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 17:51, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
"Standard Primary Habitability" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Standard Primary Habitability and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 1#Standard Primary Habitability until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Beland (talk) 10:52, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
"Standard primary habitability" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Standard primary habitability and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 1#Standard primary habitability until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Beland (talk) 10:54, 1 December 2022 (UTC)