User talk:4kumquats

Speedy deletion of City of Prague Philharmonic Orchestra

A tag has been placed on City of Prague Philharmonic Orchestra requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. To Fight a Vandal (talk) 13:52, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Multinet Matrix Grid

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Multinet Matrix Grid, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. andy (talk) 10:50, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from City of Prague Philharmonic Orchestra. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Begoon ^talk 12:14, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:19, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, 4kumquats. You have new messages at Kudpung's talk page.
Message added 12:20, 20 January 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Talkback

Hello, 4kumquats. You have new messages at Kudpung's talk page.
Message added 12:51, 20 January 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please know that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, know that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:53, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 4kumquats. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Multinet Matrix Grid, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following the reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:54, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thansk for your comments. Let's review.... There is no conflict of interest as these concepts are openly discussed offline in satellite circles for some 17 years. There is no trademark on the label for the concept as it was never protected, and on purpose it was left in the public domain. High level network engineers particularly in satellites or in network planning at your national telecom/radiocom can explain it to you.

By the way, among us admins, yes, I too am a system administrator and have helped designed global networks, thank you, so have fun!

Being an admin sometimes means being a little more flexible, drilling down to find out what is really going on, and not just zapping material and accounts on a hunch. Certainly calling someone's work a "hoax" will make serious professional people pretty angry in a heartbeat, so try to avoid that button till you get more facts. Start with your own comments on your welcome page that most people have "good intentions," I believe was the phrase you wrote... including yourself, obviously. I guess you have had a hard day as it is now late evening in your country. Do you know any NASA engineers from your country..there are some and good ones, too! Ask them about what we are writing about the linkages of current R&D and coming developments concerning space and terrestrial communications. It is interesting. No, it is not advertising, as they will happily explain. These are general concepts that are well known in satellite and space communications.

Yes, I will read your file references. Thank you and have a nice day.

We were perhaps too quick to assume your contribution was a hoax, but after investigating it, we found no sources for it at all, so it would have been deleted under any one of several other rules. For what it's worth, I am a retired professor of linguistics from Europe, and apart from being the son of a rocket scientist, I have no personal interest in your field of work - Wikipedia maintenance editors are not required to have subject knowledge for the many articles they clean up or flag for deletion. They only need to know if the articles comply with our rules and meet the criteria for inclusion. Thus, I invest my time and professionalism in helping to keep Wikipedia running smoothly. To write an article for Wikipedia, it is essential to understand that all articles must have footnotes that are linked to reliable, independent, third-party sources. Our advice pages at WP:CITE and WP:RS will explain all this for you, but basically what we are looking for are reports in the established press or television documentaries about the subject; you own web pages or research papers cannot be used for that purpose. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:41, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Prague cultural center

The article Prague cultural center has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't appear to be a notable topic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C 679 21:26, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]