User talk:4efrswm
4efrswm, you are invited to the Teahouse
[edit]Hi 4efrswm! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 01:32, 6 October 2012 (UTC) |
Welcome!
[edit]
|
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Jethro B 06:41, 21 October 2012 (UTC)Huh
[edit]So you claim to be Thomas Edgerton and that you wrote the article yourself? All right, I've tagged it accordingly. But I don't believe you. If you'd never contributed here before, how were you able to understand Wikipedia formatting in order to produce the article? Per WP:DUCK, the article has the sound of the Mike Woo sock-n-schlock farm. Qworty (talk) 01:19, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Thomas Edgerton for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thomas Edgerton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Edgerton until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:16, 10 November 2012 (UTC)