Jump to content

User talk:4cynthea

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Jack schron, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.jackschron.com/bio/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:13, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jack schron requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.jackschron.com/bio/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Amortias (T)(C) 15:13, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notes

[edit]

I'm sorry, but text that is copyright cannot be brought into Wikipedia. This is because Wikipedia is licensed under CC-BY-SA 3.0 and the GDFL for free use by anyone anywhere. Copyright text is not free to use in this way. As to the article on an opponent, Wikipedia has a policy of insisting that subjects of articles are notable - by our definition of notable. If you tell me who the opponent is, I will check the article to make sure it belongs here. WP:BIO is the policy that applies here, with WP:RS about reliable independent sources applying everywhere. WP:POLITICIAN also applies here. This states that being a candidate does not give notability, and explains which level of politician counts as notable (state legislature and above over there, MSP, AM and MP over here in the UK, and MLA in India are examples of notable - city and county councils are not). Sometimes articles slip past our patrollers and have to be caught by other means - and we do have WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS (or a somewhat ruder alternative name...) which explains that the existence of one article has no bearing on the existence of another. We do not have any policy of 'fairness' or 'equal exposure'. Various countries have laws insisting on equitable exposure on public media. We insist on notability, as I said above. This does mean that an incumbent may have an article if of a notable level of seat, while an opponent may not (unless they merit one on things outside the election). Peridon (talk) 17:09, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]