User talk:47.16.81.182

January 2017

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Daniel Craig, did not appear constructive and has been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 02:33, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2017

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Method Man, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:23, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Method Man. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 01:31, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Hello, I'm Morphdog. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Morphdog (t - c) 01:28, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Recent edit to Runaway Love (Ludacris song)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Runaway Love (Ludacris song), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 03:00, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Your recent editing history at Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — TAnthony^Talk 18:23, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Regarding Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker: The character Poe is not an "aviator" because he does not fly airplanes. No source has ever called him that. Cut it out, or you may be blocked from editing. Thanks.— TAnthony^Talk 15:27, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Desert planet, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 16:19, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Hello, I'm Alpha 4615. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Cartman Sucks—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Alpha⁴⁶¹⁵ _{(talk to me)} 19:58, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Da Boom Crew

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Da Boom Crew, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 17:04, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Alien Racers have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Materialscientist (talk) 16:04, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Teletoon at Night, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Julietdeltalima (talk) 00:43, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2020

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Fatal Attraction does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! DonIago (talk) 12:46, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Bumblebee (film), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mr.Sarcastic (talk) 13:58, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with your edits

Hi, I've noticed that your edits, at least your recent ones, are problematic in two ways: Often, they turn lots of common words into links, an example of that here. Drawing on that example, per MOS:OVERLINKING, linking normal words/phrases like "disease", "justice" "criminal activities", is not needed as most people understand them. Second, your edits often change wording to be informal, which is not appropriate per WP:TONE. For example, in this edit, you changed "caused the game to be cancelled" to "unfortunately caused this game to be cancelled". This is informal, and adding words like "unfortunately" is not neutral wording. Lastly, I have noticed that when you substitute words, some of your edits end up breaking the sentence, an example of that here -- Though it made sense to remove the "also known as" examples as three was excessive, your edit left the sentence broken: "A hidden camera also known as a spy camera or is a still or". I've noticed this in a few of your other edits, so be mindful of that. Eik Corell (talk) 13:09, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please heed the advice from Eik Corell. There's no need to link garbage can or young woman in an article about a song about domestic violence ([1]). That edit also changed a direct quote, introducing an error. Please don't do that. Adrian J. Hunter^{(talk•contribs)} 00:09, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Bratwurst, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Bmf 051 (talk) 22:58, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2020

Hello, I'm Zinnober9. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Swedish cuisine have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Zinnober9 (talk) 20:07, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Can you please stop making edits like this or this that change, for example, [[movie]]s to [[movies]] or [[movie|movies]]? The [[movie]]s style is preferred as per MOS:PIPE. Adrian J. Hunter^{(talk•contribs)} 08:08, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Eik Corell (talk) 17:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Alien Syndrome (2007 video game). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Zinnober9 (talk) 01:47, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

WP:ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Eik Corell (talk) 19:19, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 01:53, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Blocked for months (maybe years) of disruptive editing--unexplained, unverified, useless, MOS-violating edits, as well as a complete lack of communication on a collaborative project. Block partly prompted by ANI threads filed by Eik Corell. Drmies (talk) 01:54, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Hello, I'm Phuzion. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Police vehicles in Hong Kong seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Phuzion (talk) 02:39, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ghostbusters: Afterlife. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ghostbusters: Afterlife was changed by 47.16.81.182 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.939527 on 2021-03-08T21:39:06+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:39, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Eik Corell (talk) 19:01, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Roy W. Brown, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dirkbb (talk) 21:21, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Rory Cochrane. Binksternet (talk) 02:27, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:57, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

February 2022

Please stop making edits that add informal wording, unneeded hyperlinking of common words and titles, and overall do not improve articles as you did here. I have already elaborated on these problems in more detail in this previous entry on your talk page. Eik Corell (talk) 21:08, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:51, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.