Jump to content

User talk:47.144.170.146

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 2017

[edit]

Hello, I'm Home Lander. I noticed that in this edit to Frequency selective surface, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Home Lander (talk) 02:56, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

In Section 1, is the author saying that the incident E-field causes the electron to vibrate parallel to the direction of the field and then radiate in the way that antenna engineers would call an infinitesimal dipole (classic donut pattern)? If this is the case, then this makes Thompson scattering a very easy concept to understand!

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Frequency selective surface, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Nyttend (talk) 20:07, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Frequency selective surface, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Nyttend (talk) 00:39, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may not edit it because you're persistently deleting content, as you can see in the warnings. If you'd like, I will unprotect it and block you instead, or I'll unprotect it if you assure me that you won't keep it up, although of course protection will be restored if you go back to disrupting the article. Nyttend (talk) 20:21, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]