User talk:46322KozminskiUniversity

This is 46322KozminskiUniversity's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: ParseHub (January 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Rich Smith were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The references have no relation to the software whatsoever, we need to see reporting about the tool itself from reliable secondary sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ParseHub and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Rich^T|C|E-Mail 21:04, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What about this one? https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296320303854 I think its quite in depth 46322KozminskiUniversity (talk) 13:30, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 46322KozminskiUniversity! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 21:04, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Hello, I'm Framawiki. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Web scraping—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Thanks, Framawiki (please notify me when you reply) 11:13, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I miss-read your addition. May I suggest to use WP:DOI tool like https://citer.toolforge.org/?user_input=10.1016%2Fj.jbusres.2020.06.012 to generate better citations. Thanks, Framawiki (please notify me when you reply) 11:15, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't paste the abstract into Wikipedia as part of your citation. — Diannaa (talk) 14:06, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ParseHub (February 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Encoded was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see WP:SIGCOV

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ParseHub and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Encoded Talk to me! 13:08, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:ParseHub

Hello, 46322KozminskiUniversity. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:ParseHub, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:06, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]