User talk:46.97.170.78

Take some chill pills buddy

Don't try to skew wikipedia to whatever commie beliefs you hold. 2A02:A313:823D:4E00:68D9:3420:B4F7:E6FB (talk) 11:22, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

I have responded to your message. See Talk:Leslye_Headland Ed6767 (talk) 12:54, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mansplaining; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 23:19, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Binksternet This warning is a bit nonsensical, there was no "repeatedly changing content back" User:46.97.170.78 simply changed a small portion of what had been originally reverted, in an attempt to find a good edit. It was very clearly a WP:GOODFAITH edit. You should remove this template.Nithin^talk 00:16, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm RandomCanadian. I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from Communist bandit. However, Wikipedia is not censored. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 02:13, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Politrukki (talk) 15:29, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BLP

I have reverted your comments to Talk:Larry Sanger. Don't post petty insults like that just to vent. If you want to talk about improving the article, read Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons first. This policy applies to all Wikipedia pages, including talk pages. Grayfell (talk) 07:46, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm terribly sorry for getting carried away. My bad. It's just that alt right influencers are already using Sanger's name to legitimize their conspiracy theories about wikipedia, and it made me lose my cool. I reworded my comment to be less petty and insulting. 46.97.170.78 (talk) 08:15, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Administator's noticeboard

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Pudeo (talk) 08:57, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is 46.97.170.0/24. Thank you. Guy Macon (talk) 15:30, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.