User talk:46.125.250.56

Regarding material of questionable relevance on Haplogroup D-CTS3946 and Haplogroup D-M174 pages

I am writing concerning you addition of material from Cabrera et al. 2018 to the Haplogroup D-CTS3946 and Haplogroup D-M174 pages. Cabrera et al. concern the DE and E lineages and do not mention D-CTS3946 or D2, two lineages discovered after Cabrera's article was published. The haplogroup D-CTS3946 specifically concerns that haplogroup (its proposed origin, distributions and phylogeny). A source published before its discovery about its ancestor DE is not relevant to this topic and adding it is original research WP:OR. What Cabrera says about DE and E cannot be applied to D-CTS3946 unless it is explicitly done in the source (which it is not). For instance, in theory, DE could have come form Asia, back-migrated to African and mutated into D-CTS3946 there. Our job as editors is to summarize and report the sources, not interpret or synthesize them, or assume what their implications are (which is WP:OR. I will begin a topic on the Haplogroup D-CTS3946 Talk page to discuss this so that we might reach WP:CONSENSUS. Skllagyook (talk) 07:23, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, but than we should mention it like that using Cabrera et al. Thus i included it. It is the same for Haber et al., which is mostly concerned with a newly found sub-group. I am open for a balanced discussion and welcome your comment here.46.125.250.56 (talk) 07:39, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Haber et al directly concerns D2 and its ancestor. I have started a topic on the Haplogroup D-CTS3946 Talk page. Let us continue the discussion there. Skllagyook (talk) 07:42, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.