User talk:45South
Your submission at Articles for creation: Manuherikia Group has been accepted
[edit]The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
MatthewVanitas (talk) 05:13, 20 October 2014 (UTC)Notes on Manuherikia Group
[edit]Outstanding job on sourcing, middling job on formatting. But format can always be fixed later, so I went ahead and published. We'd way rather have solid sourcing than anything else, but do take a moment to clean up the formatting as indicated by guidelines at top of page.
If this geologic feature is something you can take a photo of, that'd be a great addition to the article.
Great work overall, keep sourcing strong like this in any future articles, and keep an eye out to learn smoother formatting as you go along. Thanks for your great work! MatthewVanitas (talk) 05:16, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- I searched the term "Manuherikia" on WikiMedia Commons, found a bunch of existing photos you could use. Do any of them show the geologic features you're referring to? Just go to https://commons.wikimedia.org and search the name of the region and scope the photos. To add a photo to the article, just format it like I do here (click Edit to see how I coded it). MatthewVanitas (talk) 05:18, 20 October 2014 (UTC)