User talk:45ODY

This is 45ODY's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Proposed deletion of Karistan

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Karistan, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

The fictional country by itself doesn't seem very notable under Wikipedia's guidelines. Consider merging the information into Legend of the white horse instead.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Matt (talk) 09:25, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Herzoslovakia

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Herzoslovakia, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

The fictional country by itself doesn't seem very notable under Wikipedia's guidelines. Consider merging the information into Agatha Christie instead.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Matt (talk) 09:27, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Letzenstein

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Letzenstein, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

The fictional country by itself doesn't seem very notable under Wikipedia's guidelines. Consider merging the information into Meriol Trevor instead.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Matt (talk) 09:34, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Trans-Carpathia

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Trans-Carpathia, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

The fictional country by itself doesn't seem very notable under Wikipedia's guidelines. Consider merging the information into G.I. Joe: A Real American Hero instead.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Matt (talk) 09:35, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hav

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Hav, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

I don't believe this fictional place qualifies as notable under Wikipedia's guidelines by itself.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Matt (talk) 10:01, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of St Gregory (fictional island)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article St Gregory (fictional island), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

I don't believe that this fictional place qualifies as notable on its own. Perhaps merge this information into Island at War?

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Matt (talk) 10:03, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bretzelburg

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Bretzelburg, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

I don't believe that this fictional place qualifies as notable on its own.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Matt (talk) 10:04, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Darklonia

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Darklonia, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

I don't believe that this fictional place qualifies as notable under Wikipedia's guidelines on its own. Perhaps this information could go into the G.I. Joe: A Real American Hero article instead.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Matt (talk) 10:05, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Latvislavia

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Latvislavia, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

I don't believe that this fictional place qualifies as notable under Wikipedia's guidelines on its own. Perhaps the information could be merged into the Donald Duck article.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Matt (talk) 10:09, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gonobutz

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Gonobutz, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

I don't believe that this fictional place qualifies as notable under Wikipedia's guidelines on its own. Perhaps the information could be merged into the Barelli article.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Matt (talk) 10:10, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anatruria

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Anatruria, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

I don't believe that this fictional place qualifies as notable under Wikipedia's guidelines on its own.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Matt (talk) 03:34, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

45ODY (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I never vandalized, and I had only been on for two days! Please unblock me.

Decline reason:

Your request to be unblocked is declined because it does not address the reason for your block or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince administrators either (a) that the block was made in error or (b) that the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you are blocked for, you will not do it again and you will make productive contributions instead. Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Sandstein 19:52, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your block isn't for vandalism; it's for sockpuppetry. Could you respond to that? Mango juice^talk 16:42, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Karistan

I have nominated Karistan, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karistan. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Matt (talk) 17:21, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/45ODY for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Matt (talk) 15:45, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]