Jump to content

User talk:42.98.100.27

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Shajure (talk) 22:05, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please see wp:talk

[edit]

Please understand that the talk page is not for discussion of the article subject: It is for discussing changes to the article. Please see wp:talk.Shajure (talk) 22:17, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly. Coincidentally you are the one and the only one who continues to refuse to discuss the stuffs you'd removed and the reasons why you'd removed them. 42.98.100.27 (talk) 12:28, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:25, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

42.98.100.27 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

No one ever demonstrated why my edits are relevant to the geography warrior thing they talked about. My edits are simply unrelated to Hong Kong geography. 42.98.100.27 (talk) 15:28, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are blocked for violating WP:EW. Yamla (talk) 10:42, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I frankly don't care much about the "Hong Kong geography warrior" case because I don't entirely understand what led to it. What I saw, though, is an edit war on multiple pages, and continuing to edit war a) isn't the solution regardless if you're right, and b) had to be stopped somehow. If you experience repeated reverts as an alleged "sockpuppet" or "block evader", the correct action is to attempt talking to the other user directly, and if that doesn't work, to discuss the matter at WP:ANI. Constantly reverting each other isn't an option. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:31, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
But that's their only reason to undo my edits, a reason which no one understands. That's simply an irrelevant excuse to me and what they did was just like covering up their vandalism. Two pages were involved one of which a talk page. Where can that be discussed? Honestly I got no idea. 42.98.100.27 (talk) 15:36, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Could you help ask that user to explain? 42.98.100.27 (talk) 15:37, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have just quickly gone through the long-term abuse case that you provided the hyperlink above. Citobun and some other users have listed a huge number of Hong Kong IP addresses as being related to the "geography warriors". But many of them got no edit history related to "Hong Kong geography". It appears that some people are themselves abusing the long-term abuses reporting mechanism. 42.98.100.27 (talk) 15:42, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not even excluding this possibility, which is why the block is for edit warring, not block evasion. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:03, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The reason why my edits were reverted was never clearly stated nor was it apparent to anyone. The so-called warring was the result of what was erroneously done. Please rectify the records. 42.98.100.27 (talk) 13:08, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for block evasion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  EvergreenFir (talk) 21:29, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
The previous block was erroneously imposed and in any case that had been expired more than two weeks ago. 42.98.100.27 (talk) 16:01, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

42.98.100.27 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

The block on the Hong Kong geography warrior has most certainly not expired, nor is it ever likely to do so. Yamla (talk) 16:23, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am not connected with any "warrior" or abuse and I don't think my edits got much to do with Hong Kong geography. 42.98.100.27 (talk) 11:28, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@ToBeFree. 42.98.100.27 (talk) 11:28, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the ping, but I think I have already indicated a lack of interest in the "geography warrior" thing. I had blocked you for edit warring, which you objectively had engaged in. That's all. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:45, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, ToBeFree, for your assistance and repeated clarifications. As I said I was made to be appearing like edit warring last time you blocked because I was mistaken as somebody who was part of those "warriors". I got no idea why there was such a misunderstanding. And anyhow that block you imposed had finished a few weeks ago. But those people had persisted and have gone so far to revert my edits about the Comoros for no valid reason and block me for block evasion. Would be thankful if you may help explain to these people and lift the block. 42.98.100.27 (talk) 15:23, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hm. "Made to be appearing like edit warring"? I'd say you have pretty actively edit warred at Maldives ([1], [2], [3], [4]) and Talk:Country ([5], [6], [7], [8], [9]). That's not an impression caused by others, that was your mouse and your clicking. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:36, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]