User talk:41ozToFreedom

Welcome!

Hello, 41ozToFreedom, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Michael Catherwood did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Tacyarg (talk) 11:06, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bruh 41ozToFreedom (talk) 00:35, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mattdaviesfsic were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:41ozToFreedom/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 08:29, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 41ozToFreedom! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 08:29, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Yamla (talk) 18:58, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

41ozToFreedom (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here I was unaware that my device(s) have been used to sock puppet on Wikipedia. I am left confused as I do not remember doing this. I left my devices which were logged into Wikipedia alone for an extended period of time, which may have been the reason why my account is blocked now. Let me assure you, that this has not been an action done by me, as my determination to provide factual information through wikipedia could never be never be any stronger than now. Furthermore, If this issue cannot be resolved, would it be allowed to create another Wikipedia account in order to keep editing factual information? Thank you for understanding.

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 23:38, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To the reviewing WP:CHECKUSER admin, I think the CU data is unambiguously clear and very straightforward. However, I am claiming this is a WP:GOODHAND situation. If you disagree, I'm happy to discuss the matter with you or if I'm away (upcoming trip), you are free to act as you see fit. --Yamla (talk) 21:37, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. Also. Check the CU logs, especially around 2021-12-05, and compare with the racist edits from SuzzieBakahSUSSYlol. --Yamla (talk) 21:41, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I still do not clearly remember creating that account. Furthermore, I was not near my device at that time of day, nor do I recall any information about the pages which this account edited or the anti-Semitic and racist information this account added to 3 separate pages. 41ozToFreedom (talk) 21:45, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How do I view CU logs? 41ozToFreedom (talk) 21:54, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can't. --Yamla (talk) 21:58, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Drop the additude please. 41ozToFreedom (talk) 22:00, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You literally can't. See WP:CHECKUSER. --Yamla (talk) 22:01, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am aware, 41ozToFreedom (talk) 22:02, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, please process and look over my other statement regarding my absence from my device when this account was created. 41ozToFreedom (talk) 22:01, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have nothing to add to that. The reviewing administrator will take your claims into account when reviewing your unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 22:03, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. 41ozToFreedom (talk) 22:04, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am Johnny the Vandal User:Mike Garcia. 41ozToFreedom (talk) 22:32, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:41ozToFreedom/sandbox

Hello, 41ozToFreedom. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:32, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]