User talk:38.121.133.2

March 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Eugene Park has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Harry (talk) 22:30, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

TransPerfect

Please explain the removal of large sections of text, as you did on the TransPerfect page. I can see that you have been involved with the article for a period of time, and I recommend that you do not edit the page in the interests of the company (or any of its representatives), as this is an encyclopedic resource. It is not a publicity/PR tool. Thanks. Regards,--Soulparadox (talk) 07:15, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I noticed that you recently removed some content from TransPerfect with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — MusikAnimal ^talk 17:35, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2016

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to TransPerfect, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 20:12, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2017

Hello, I'm Bentogoa. I noticed that in this edit to TransPerfect, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Bentogoa (talk) 15:16, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

TransPerfect

Please do not remove entire sections of the article without a good reason; the arictle has a talkpage, create a topic there concerning your removal of the section and your reasoning as to why it should be deleted. Show why it should be deleted, don't just do it.

You show several instances of doing this with little to no reason given - any further deletions along this line will be considered vandalism. HalfShadow 19:58, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at TransPerfect, you may be blocked from editing. HalfShadow 22:48, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 23:12, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

March 2018

Hello, I'm NottNott. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Elizabeth W. Porter— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -Nott Nott 20:19, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Hello. Your recent edit to Shropshire appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Wham2001 (talk) 18:38, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Walter A. McDougall, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:22, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.