User talk:37KZ

Hello, 37KZ and a belated welcome to Wikipedia! I see that you've already been around awhile and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help one get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions, you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are interested in learning more about contributing, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Red Director (talk) 17:15, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Disambiguation link notification for September 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

2019–20 HockeyAllsvenskan season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mora

HockeyAllsvenskan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mora

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:40, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Väsby IK, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Athletics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:23, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2008 Nordic Trophy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2009 Nordic Trophy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:33, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Idol 2019 (Sweden), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Queen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:36, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Hello, I'm Magnolia677. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Zara Larsson, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:42, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Kalle Östman

Hello, 37KZ,

Thank you for creating Kalle Östman.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add clear references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 16:27, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Certainty are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Paradoctor (talk) 18:17, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:11, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

37KZ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I’ve faced a lot of stress with work and my family and it wrongly led to me taking it out on Wikipedia through humiliation and trolling. I’m very sorry for this and I’ve Actually been in talks with a psychologist for half a year to better control my anger and frustration. I shouldn’t blame Wikipedia for the stuff going om in my personal life. My real life situation is stable now and I promise I won’t disrupt Wikipedia Im the future. I request a probationary unblock. --37KZ (talk) 09:24, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Your unblock request does not address the reason for the block which is sockpuppetry. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 09:27, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

37KZ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked because I disrupted Wikipedia with alternate accounts. I'm very sorry for what happened, my mood was unstable during that time but I know that what I did was simply unacceptable and did not improve the encyclopedia, instead causing mess that needed to be undone by other editors. My only goal if I get an unblock is to work with article editing, I'm not really interested in the meta processes and discussions. I know that's (article work) where my strongest point is, and is something I haven't been blocked for. I suppose checkusers will be keeping an eye on me after this, but I'll accept that as punishment. I'll accept a one-account restriction if necessary. --37KZ (talk) 12:03, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed block evasion this month. And it was bad enough for you to lose your talk page access on the IP address you were editing from. There's no chance you'll be unblocked in the near future. Yamla (talk) 13:59, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.