User talk:33rd rec john

Welcome!

Hello, 33rd rec john, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Biggles(mount and musket), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! —KuyaBriBri^Talk 19:51, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Biggles(mount and musket)

Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 19:51, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Forum war of 2011"

A page you created, Forum war of 2011, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it serves only to attack some entity. Please do not continue to create attack pages, as you will be blocked from editing.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Monty ₈₄₅ 19:55, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mount&Musket:Battalion

The article Mount&Musket:Battalion has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

game mod, fails WP:GNG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kevin (talk) 20:27, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mount&Musket:Battalion for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mount&Musket:Battalion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mount&Musket:Battalion until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Kevin (talk) 20:45, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 33rd regiment of foot (Mount&Musket:Battalion)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 33rd regiment of foot (Mount&Musket:Battalion) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. KarikaSlayer (talk) 22:00, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

Although your clan has people in it, and the article had two references, I still deleted the article. Simple existence is not enough to warrant inclusion in Wikipedia (see WP:ITEXISTS). In order for an article to remain on Wikipedia, it needs to meet the notability guidelines. For your article, more specific ones are found here. It would need to have coverage reliable sources (newspapers, magazines, etc.) that are independent of the subject. Although you included references, one was not independent (the group's own website) and one was not reliable (forums). If the notability guidelines cannot be met, you might try another wiki that has less stringent guidelines for inclusion. Also, it is strongly recommended that those with a conflict of interest with a subject do not write articles about it. It's best to wait for someone else to write about your group. See the conflict of interest guidelines at WP:COI. If you have any questions, please feel free to leave a note on my talk page. Cheers! – GorillaWarfare ^{talk • contribs} 03:20, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What do you not understand? The vague explanation is: it fit the speedy deletion criterion A7. I expanded upon this above. – GorillaWarfare ^{talk • contribs} 15:39, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

well it annoyes me when people like you delete or get rid of things that I make, just leave things alone!

A few things:

It is not your article; once you hit the "Save page" button, it becomes the community's article and can be edited at will by anybody within common sense and our policies and guidelines.
I have placed the deletion tag back on the article here; it needs to stay up for the duration of the deletion discussion so that others will know that a deletion discussion is taking place, which is for the benefit of everybody.

Regards, –MuZemike 18:22, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, just next time could you give me a chance to edit it before you delete it,

removal of deletion notices

Do not remove AfD notices from articles. It will not stop the articles from being deleted, and is against the rules. Kevin (talk) 20:07, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry you didn't post anything on the talk page for several days. I assumed it was over.

May 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Ninelands primary school. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. TexasAndroid (talk) 19:15, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did at Talk:Murder of James Bulger, you may be blocked from editing. Woody (talk) 21:37, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How many danm rules does wikipedia have? i cant fart without you lot sending me a message33rd rec john (talk) 16:24, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]