Jump to content

User talk:321LetsJam

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


October 2017

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to The Beyond (film) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:43, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to The Beyond (film) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:51, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/321LetsJam. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  GeneralNotability (talk) 22:43, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

321LetsJam (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not done any of the things I have been accused of here. I have ONE account and this is the one I use for everything, from correcting inaccuracies in Japanese monster movies to writing a biography of Veronica Lazar. I do not know this Letsfixthis1007. You seem to be upset about my FRIDAY THE 13th PART 2 edits. Here is my evidence. First, in 1981, movies were not released on Thursdays, they were released on Friday. Two, here is a calendar of April 1981. https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/0XA6srP0WJKI6-OcYMGROXR1nEYvW6pNiE_BjHd7EFv9dgYm5jZj2NHcrj9RxHUgIOTXJDlUZQDe-fzX2smVrmBvUZ7ZNCXn272lum9AdhmJcBJ5s0bVeUeahu5ASMVNAzJXgRRWOPHDL8lHLsic Note that April 30th is on a Thursday. Thirdly, here is a TV spot for the film: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aw9mFGXZ-1Q What does it say? Opens Friday. Friday would've been May 1st. It does not matter what your sources say because they are wrong. This movie opened on a Friday. April 30th 1981 was a Thursday. And I have never tried to break wikipedia's rules like I'm being accused of. If you have a problem with this Letsfixthis-whatever, go after them. But this blocking is an error on your part. 321LetsJam (talk) 00:42, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Nominally this is sort of a procedural decline since you have two open unblock requests. But I find "It does not matter what your sources say because they are wrong" to betray an underlying attitude that's not very conducive to working well with others, as well as somewhat at odds with accepted practice here when you strongly believe a source to be mistaken. — Daniel Case (talk) 18:42, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

321LetsJam (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't work well with others and never claimed to and isn't that what you've accused me of, being in collusion? So which is it? Am I colluding or do I not work well with others? This is not worth my time or effort. Good luck with your site cause I'm done with your railroading asses. 321LetsJam (talk) 21:38, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We don't appreciate being berated while trying to resolve an unblock request. It appears, solely through your communications, that you do not have the competence required to edit here at this time. If you do wish to contribute to Wikipedia, I recommend waiting some time and requesting the standard offer. Anarchyte (talk) 08:56, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I believe you when you say that you're not using multiple accounts. However, there certainly seems to be something going on here between you and User:Letsfixthis1007. The obvious assumption is that you're acting in collusion, which is functionally the same thing as using multiple accounts. How else do you explain the similarity between this edit and this edit, which were made to the same article within a day of each other? You're saying this is just some cosmic coincidence? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:35, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

321LetsJam (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yes, I am saying it's a cosmic coincidence, whether you believe that or not. Chiefly because it took me 10 minutes to figure out what you were trying to show me. I don't know wikipedia or how to work it this well. Secondly, but more importantly, I didn't know about the theatrical poster. The release date being on the poster is news to me. So whoever LetsFixThis is, they apparently knew more about it than I did. I also don't believe that movies were released on Wednesdays back then. I do not remember that ever happening until the 2000s rolled around. The only thing I know about this LetsFixThis person is I received a notification a couple of weeks after April 30th thanking me for the edit I made. I found that strange, because I'd never been thanked for edits before, not even when I more or less overhauled the Veronica Lazar page (by the way, guys, she didn't spell her name with an accent mark. I know because her children don't spell it with an accent mark and my autograph doesn't have an accent mark). Anyway, I don't know how to prove that I do not know this person other than telling you I don't. FRIDAY THE 13th PART 2 is not worth any of this hassle, and it's certainly not worth the effort to undertake what you've accused me of. 321LetsJam (talk) 04:43, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Only one open unblock request at a time, please. You are welcome to reply, but every reply does not need the unblock formatting. SQLQuery me! 04:35, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:321LetsJam&oldid=1024632952"