User talk:31.205.18.37

December 2019

Please stop your disruptive behaviour. It appears you are purposefully harassing another editor. Wikipedia aims to provide a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing other users potentially compromises that safe environment. If you continue behaving like this, you may be blocked from editing. Your WP:WIKIHOUNDING and WP:PERSONALATTACKS in your edits summaries is simply abhorrent. Gotitbro (talk) 09:20, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanction alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

El_C 18:18, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@El C: I have provided the diffs I have noticed Gotitbro and the majority of his contributions have a very nationalistic and Anti Pakistan tone he pushes everything as Indian and removes content with spurious accussations of "rvt pov edit" when there is not pov at all he did the same in distillation and other places he has issue with Pakistan being mentioned in distillation and pushes Indias name into everything look at the Nagalim page he keeps deleting sourced information from he United Nations. Picking on me is unjust I only recently came across this user and he has made thousands of pov edits. 31.205.18.37 (talk) 18:35, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gotitbro already got that discretionary sanction alert, but you didn't. I suggest you make your case, backed up by evidence, at the ANI discussion referred to below. El_C 18:53, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ANI discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Gotitbro (talk) 18:37, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Distillation

Thanks for your contributions to distillation. I have tried to track down the Paolo Rovesti reference, but all I've found so far are unfootnoted mentions in articles about perfumery. On the other hand, the archaeological research on distillation in South Asia goes much further back than 1975. In particular, the Taxila excavations were published in 1951, and the report explicitly talks about condensers. I've added the info to the article in the right section. I also found a reference to a Pakistani article which is apparently skeptical about distillation, but I haven't been able to find the article itself. --Macrakis (talk) 21:24, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.