User talk:2pxc

This is 2pxc's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Glorb (June 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Doesn't appear to meet WP:NMUSICIAN from cited sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Glorb and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Liance^talk 20:53, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 2pxc! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~Liance^talk 20:53, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Glorb might not be notable yet for WP, but a couple of Fandom sites--Encyclopedia SpongeBobia and Wikitubia--could accommodate what's already there so far. (Commenting on your behalf as well as original page creator CactusJuice615 (talk · contribs)'s.) --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 02:16, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's only potentially true, and I say that because of his Spotify viewership as well as YouTube and TikTok following, which as of right now is probably our best source of showing musical success on his part. I'm not an expert, but I'm pretty sure sites like Fandom are user-generated, and while you have a point, I want to be one of the pioneers, if you will, to bring this article to Wikipedia. Ever since the release of MoistCr1TiKaL's interview with Glorb, more and more news articles (AKA potentially usable sources) have been popping up detailing how he operates, and especially with the recent discoveries made about his identity since then, that could be a key event in getting this article to become a reality.

If we really wanted to, I feel like we could file this under WikiProject:YouTube, but I feel like Glorb doesn't 100% fit in that category and is better placed as a musical artist. He has pioneered the practical usage of AI to create great pieces of music, which I feel makes him notable- but we will have to wait and see what else comes up to prove his notability.

On another note, I'm not sure what happened to CactusJuice615, but I found a great degree of what he wrote to be unsuitable for an encyclopedic site like Wikipedia, so I revised it and added more content to better fit the website's guidelines as well as keep the article on a neutral standpoint as outlined in WP:NPOV. While he did originally make this draft, it has been abandoned long since and I think after a period of inactivity lasting four months it is safe to assume he is no longer managing the article. I will still give him credit for starting the article, but I have to give myself credit for what work is due, too. 2pxc. ^dms 02:36, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]