User talk:2point5ken

Hello 2point5ken, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

2point5ken, good luck, and have fun. – Mohamed^Talk 01:22, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The discussion is about the topic Talk:Cash Cash. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! — TransporterMan (TALK) 13:06, 18 July 2014 (UTC) (DRN volunteer)[reply]

Cash Cash

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Chubbles (talk) 19:23, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ken, as I noted on the article talk page, the reason that paragraph reads as it does is because I had to meticulously document, using original quotes, why it was important to include that genre designation. This is a direct result of your claim that it was inappropriate; it is necessary for me to include these quotes because it directly refutes your position. The end result, I think, is actually a much fuller description of what the band sounded like on Take It to the Floor - in fact, much better than the description of their later sound. You may focus your edits on whatever you like, of course, but I can't help but think maybe your talents are better served expanding the latter style paragraph, which frankly could be twice as large or more than it is now - there are two albums to describe, as well as several more-robustly-covered singles. Plus, adding content to talk about later style elements would help correct any perceived imbalance in coverage. If you'd like to continue down the emo-pop line (and it's been months of niggling over these details, now), I'd prefer that you do it on the article talk page, since I am not the gatekeeper. (The community is the gatekeeper, though unfortunately, most of the time, nobody else in the community has anything else to say. But at least that way they have the chance.) Chubbles (talk) 17:39, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:14, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Cash Cash, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. - TheMagnificentist 21:44, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]