User talk:2agilbert
Forget all that.. Misread a source. Ouch and my apologies. Kerrow 20:27, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Please read
[edit]WP:SPA - your edit regarding the addition of the fansite to the article does qualify as a reliable source. You may also want to read WP:SOCK. Glen 04:15, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- 2agilbert is not a sock puppet. This is now the second time you've accused me of below-board edits. Please stop.Kevin Crossman 15:58, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
- Glen, I'm a real person.... I assure you. I know you say the filmography rational is obvious, but a lot of the Frat Pack history pages consist of edits by people who don't get the obviousness like you do. Unqualified movies (and actors for that matter) going on and off the lists constantly... I was just trying to add some stability here. No, the word I'm looking for is actually "reliability". But I'm sure this is against some wiki policy you will quote to me, again. My mistake. How do other Wiki pages deal with editors who just wake up one morning and decide to change the defintion of something obvious. Like call all dollars "cents" and then change the definition on Wiki? I'm sure someone would very quickly UNDO this, because everyone knows a dollar is not a cent, but where would you go to prove it isn't? Would the person who did the UNDO be required to PROVE that a dollar isn't a cent? I doubt it, the rational is pretty obvious. But what if they didn't make cents? What would be do then? 2agilbert 05:36, 23 September 2007 (UTC)