User talk:2K LMG

2K LMG, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi 2K LMG! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Killer (film) (January 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is an unreleased film, and does not satisfy film notability guidelines.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Killer (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Killer (film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 22:07, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Úna Ní Dhonghaíle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page All is True. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dennis Gassner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kevin Reynolds.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jeffrey Kurland, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Collateral and The Dictator.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Adam McKay

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Adam McKay, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:39, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Beetlejuice, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 03:14, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Beetlejuice 2, you may be blocked from editing. Sundayclose (talk) 23:44, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Hi 2K LMG! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at List of highest-grossing film directors that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. TompaDompa (talk) 13:52, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ron Howard's unrealized projects (August 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I agree with the previous reviewer. Start a discussion on at Ron Howard. Also need sources that have written in-depth about the overall topic (i.e. his unrealized projects) not just the individual projects and need sources that the project did not move forward. (Note, they might be here but there's too many sources to go through).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ron Howard's unrealized projects and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 17:32, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at The Boys in the Boat (film). BBQboffin^{grill me} 00:49, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please use commas both before and after the year in the American date format

Please use commas both before and after the year when you include a date in the American date format, such as you did in this edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Untitled_Guy_Ritchie_project&oldid=1210000477 Commas are always required both before and after the year in the American date format no matter what. Nicholas0 (talk) 09:03, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Paul Greengrass's unrealized projects

Hello, 2K LMG. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Paul Greengrass's unrealized projects, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:06, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recommendation regarding Draft:Sam Mendes' unrealized projects

Hello, I noticed the recent draft popped up on . I have created several pages under this category and I recommend you to definitely publish it; the more of these we build up, the better. The article is missing some projects though; Sweeney Todd, The Kite Runner, The Lookout, and Oz the Great and Powerful. ZanderAlbatraz1145 (talk) 15:24, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sam Mendes' unrealized projects has been accepted

Sam Mendes' unrealized projects, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Waqar💬 06:56, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Paul Greengrass's unrealized projects

Hello, 2K LMG. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Paul Greengrass's unrealized projects".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:48, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! – Daℤyzzos (✉️ • 📤) 12:56, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

More 'Unrealized projects' pages

Hello, I have information and sources regarding possible 'Unrealized projects' draft pages for Joe Carnahan, John Waters, Brett Ratner, and several others, but I believe pages are necessary on those three, considering the amount of refs. I wanted to ask if you'd like to collaborate with me on making possible article drafts for them; I just need help adequately summarizing the key points for the projects and in creating the pages themselves, which would move move a lot faster and with productivity if I had another user to help me make them. (I must add that I have the ref links set aside on my sandbox page where I have already compiled a catalogue of the project titles, but they have yet to be written out, organized, and properly formated) Thank you. ZanderAlbatraz1145 (talk) 23:39, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Shawn Levy's unrealized projects

Hey, buddy, (-whistle call sound-), new information has been added to Draft:Shawn Levy's unrealized projects. It is currently awaiting publication and if you want a larger chance of it being accepted and moved to the main space, there's some touching up that needs to be done. If you don't care what happens with it then, boy, sure seems like a lot of wasted effort on your part. I was happy to add additional sources and references to it, to make it more viable. You're welcome. If you bother seeing or reading this, take a look at my last message, which can be read directly above this one. Thanks for your time. Cheers. ZanderAlbatraz1145 (talk) 19:05, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the message. Will begin touching up immediately. 2K LMG (talk) 11:53, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bravo! Bravo! Now that's an article! Hey, listen, I have information for a potential 'John Ford's unrealized projects' article, how you feel if I handed you over the information and you created a page for it, wrote out the information, etc. If you don't like the idea of a Ford page, I also have potential ones I've planned on Roman Polanski, Christopher McQuarrie, Brett Ratner, Joe Carnahan, Mark Rydell, George Cukor, Frank Lloyd Wright, Michelangelo, I mean, help yourself visit my sandbox and take your pick, fuck it. I would like your help with them and have an abundance of information regarding all. Thank you for your time. ZanderAlbatraz1145 (talk) 02:20, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I could start working on pages for Carnahan and McQuarrie this weekend. At the moment I just created a draft page for Matt Reeves' unrealized projects and will be spending today and tomorrow mostly expanding that. 2K LMG (talk) 18:07, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds great! Let me know which ones you choose, if you decide to do both, or if you have an interest in doing any on not just contemporary filmmakers. There seems to be an abundance of those, enough as it is. It's becoming more and more necessary to expand into other territories for the Category; old Hollywood directors, foreign directors, and the other arts as well — architecture, literature. That's why I'd like to get one going on Frank Lloyd Wright for the time being. If that gets on well, I propose ones on Le Corbusier and Michelangelo. Unrealized projects are not limited just to film directors. They could be from anyone! ZanderAlbatraz1145 (talk) 03:44, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Carnahan or McQuarrie or Other ?

Have you decided which page you'd like to begin work on a draft for this weekend? Christopher McQuarrie's unrealized projects, Joe Carnahan's unrealized projects, or another like Roman Polanski or Brett Ratner or John Ford. I already have the John Ford one all listed out and everything, with dates and titles, so that might be the most logical place to start. Keep me posted, so I can supply the titles and sources. Thanks. ZanderAlbatraz1145 (talk) 23:14, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

P. S., Ratner may make the most sense of all three to do a page on since he has the most projects to go unrealized out of the ones we've discussed. ZanderAlbatraz1145 (talk) 23:15, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TIME'S UP!

Times up, 2K LMG! Still at work on the Reeves page? Either way, the weekend is up, it's about to be Tuesday. Have we gotten started on one of the page collaboration propositions I proposed to you? Or have you picked out which one you would like to start on with me at least? Get back to me when you can. Thanks for the time, as always. ZanderAlbatraz1145 (talk) 00:24, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Have started working on a McQuarrie page. Not much work done yet on it. 2K LMG (talk) 01:03, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have a lot of stuff to give you. Not sure how to pass it over. For now, I'm just going to paste all the project titles I accumulated in order — and then their links/sources unformatted in random order below it. ZanderAlbatraz1145 (talk) 03:27, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disregard this last message. I did more than I should have to the article, but I made it easier. Thanks. ZanderAlbatraz1145 (talk) 04:14, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher McQuarrie's unrealized projects

Hello. Do you plan to do anymore work on the McQuarrie draft page or would you like to move into something else? Perhaps the John Ford or Roman Polanski ones since I already have some stuff written out for those, I just need help with the writing out of more info. ZanderAlbatraz1145 (talk) 17:13, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shawn Levy's unrealized projects (August 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by PARAKANYAA was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Are there any sources that discuss this topic, instead of the individual projects?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shawn Levy's unrealized projects and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

PARAKANYAA (talk) 07:03, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Roland Emmerich's unrealized projects

Hello, I've been touching up the draft article Draft:Roland Emmerich's unrealized projects for a while now. It's in desperate need of renovation and fleshing out key points from the articles. I included links for the one's that needed it to help get it started, but I could use your help in writing them out. Care to help? (P.S.; I think it might be safe to resubmit the Shawn Levy one once we write out the references for some of the listed films). ZanderAlbatraz1145 (talk) 18:58, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Further work on Draft:Roland Emmerich's unrealized projects

Emmerich draft could still use some work, notably Isobar and Happy Birthday, Mr. President, so if you could write out those, then we should be all set to submit 👍 ZanderAlbatraz1145 (talk) 16:57, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Distant Vision; Coppola's unrealized projects

Hello my friend! Hope you are well. I could use your wonderfully eloquent writing talents to finish off a section of the Francis Ford Coppola's unrealized projects page. It is currently blank, with six sources that need written out. I would be most grateful for, and the page would greatly benefit from your help, in order to make it more complete. So I ask you to please write out Distant Vision, using the provided sources. ZanderAlbatraz1145 (talk) 00:09, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]