User talk:2603:8001:C2F0:7D0:400C:4040:CD7A:4142

October 2024

Hello, I'm R0paire-wiki. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Fictosexuality have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. R0paire-wiki (talk) 03:10, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

What was non-constructive about it? 2603:8001:C2F0:7D0:400C:4040:CD7A:4142 (talk) 03:20, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

You removed a tag that was correctly there, and then added unsourced content. R0paire-wiki (talk) 03:32, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

I strongly disagree with the reasoning for the “fringe theory” tag. I’ve seen the talk page, it boils down to “this is not real” 2603:8001:C2F0:7D0:400C:4040:CD7A:4142 (talk) 03:39, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

You may disagree with it, but it is sourced and your edit was reverted, so you need to gain consensus before removing templates.

We do have a policy of BRD, but when an admin reverted your previous edit, then that was grounds to discuss to get consensus for your edit; repeated attempts to restore reverted content is considered edit warring and would result in a block. R0paire-wiki (talk) 03:47, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Fictosexuality. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. R0paire-wiki (talk) 03:50, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

I don’t want to edit war either, it doesn’t really solve anything. I tried opening a discussion on the talk page and an editor just laughed at me… I guess it shows how fruitless this is and how broken i am for being this way 2603:8001:C2F0:7D0:400C:4040:CD7A:4142 (talk) 04:02, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Original research

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:55, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, 2603:8001:C2F0:7D0:400C:4040:CD7A:4142,

Don't make content decisions based on your own point of view or misplaced views you want to "correct". All of your claims have to be supported by reliable sources, not your personal opinion. Continuing to do this will result in a longer block. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:57, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

---