User talk:2601:85:C101:BA30:3184:8747:B83:4783

WW1

I would strongly suggest you walk away now, you are exhausting a lot of users patience, and making accusations of disruption because editors do not agree with you in never a good idea unless you are on very firm ground policy wise.Slatersteven (talk) 14:30, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How so? The Banner and FDW have severely lowered the quality of the article. They literally have refused to change the location of Africa in the chart, and refuse to contribute to the discussion by saying what they think is part of WW1. I will "walk away," but I need assurances that you or some other informed user won't let the absurdity they're doing go on. 2601:85:C101:BA30:3184:8747:B83:4783 (talk) 14:33, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We can just put it to the Neutral nations part of the chart?.Driverofknowledge (talk) 14:35, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lets not discus changes to the article in two separate places. I am advising you this attitude may not go well for you.Slatersteven (talk) 14:40, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I wish it were that easy. Yes, that, but you (not me, because according to the Banner and FDW my edits are the spawn of the devil) also need to specify that the 750k number refers to all of Africa's civilians as per the source used, and not just East Africa. And then you also have to take out the Balkan War numbers that are currently part of Serbia's losses, fix the chart numbers, etc. It's just too much to redo all over again. And I went to the MilHist talk page because I believed that more editors need to see the what was going down on the page, though I will desist per your recommendation. 2601:85:C101:BA30:3184:8747:B83:4783 (talk) 14:43, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have asked you to stop before they wield the hammer of banning, what happens now is on your head.Slatersteven (talk) 14:45, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If they're going to try to ban me then so be it. I know Wikipedia is about consensus and not truth, but I absolutely refuse to let Africa be listed as an Allied power on an Internet encyclopedia. This is absolute insanity. 2601:85:C101:BA30:3184:8747:B83:4783 (talk) 14:49, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hello, I'm The Banner. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, it's important to be mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors, who may be frustrated by certain types of interaction, such as your addition to Talk:World War I casualties. While you probably didn't intend any offense, please do remember that Wikipedia strives to be an inclusive atmosphere. In light of that, it would be greatly appreciated if you could moderate yourself so as not to offend. Thank you. The Banner talk 14:46, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please be careful about what you say to people. Some remarks, such as your addition to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history can easily be misinterpreted, or viewed as harassment. Wikipedia is a supportive environment, where contributors should feel comfortable and safe while editing. Thank you. The Banner talk 14:47, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I feel wp:spa might be worth a read.Slatersteven (talk) 15:15, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously? Not true. [1]. And this [2]. I am mostly interested in fixing the WW1 article and military stuff in general, but I am not "single purpose." Come on. 2601:85:C101:BA30:3184:8747:B83:4783 (talk) 15:35, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So you have a dynamic IP? this is why an account would be better. It avoids the appearance of socking.Slatersteven (talk) 15:39, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I'm sorry. I've never got around really to making an account. 2601:85:C101:BA30:3184:8747:B83:4783 (talk) 15:40, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This creates a lot of unnecessary work for the rest of us. This might go someway to explaining why (perhaps) you have encountered more hostility then you would otherwise have done. We are all unpaid volunteers doing this as a hobby, so anything that makes this harder tends to provoke adverse reaction.Slatersteven (talk) 15:48, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I've been guessing that because I am an IP, I naturally would be a target. I would probably do the same in your shoes. Once again, apologies for any confusion. 2601:85:C101:BA30:3184:8747:B83:4783 (talk) 15:52, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I should say my IP used to be 98.something so I was pretty steady for about a year, but recently my IP has been going all over the place. I would rather it had stayed IP 98.something to avoid the appearance of vandalism. 2601:85:C101:BA30:3184:8747:B83:4783 (talk) 15:54, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Making a account can help https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Why_create_an_account%3F.

Reputation, communication, and more successful edits

Having an account gives you a fixed Wikipedia identity that other users will recognize. While we welcome contributions from unregistered editors, logging in under a user name lets you build trust and respect through a history of good edits, and makes it easier for veteran users to assume good faith, communicate and collaborate. Having a good name (or a pseudonym to protect your identity) promotes more responsible editing, and more civil discourse.

Sometimes new or unregistered users are prevented from editing pages that are common targets of vandalism (just as this page is protected, and only users with an account can edit it). Also, bots can mistake even good-faith IP address edits for vandalism. For these reasons, edits under a user name tend to be more successful.

Your user name may also receive recognition for good work such as Barnstars, Project Awards, Personal User Awards, or nomination for voted accolades like Editor of the Week. You need a fixed account identity to accumulate these pats on the back; they are not awarded to IP addresses.

As your reputation builds, it is possible to earn privileges such as rollback, sysop/administrator, and others. It is not possible for an unregistered editor to be granted these privileges.

Thanks Driver, I appreciate the advice. The thing is, I have private reasons why I cannot create an account, so I must edit thru IPs unfortunately, which means I arrive at any discussion with an immediate handicap. I am still relatively new to Wikipedia, and most of my edits have been somewhat minor/medium-sized and constructive, like at Kapp Putsch [3]. The only major improvements I've ever tried here is the WW1 casualties article (which has sadly been undone), and Draft:Neutral powers during World War I, which is incomplete and I would be happy if people can chip in. 2601:85:C101:BA30:3184:8747:B83:4783 (talk) 16:05, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by private reasons ?Driverofknowledge (talk) 03:17, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure that is not almost wp:outing. We should not ask such questions unless we have serious concerns (and also well found) of socking or block evasion, or similar attempts to hide behind anonymity. If you feel this is the case report it.Slatersteven (talk) 11:18, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See, my IP changed again, annoying. Yes, it is for private reasons, sorry. 2601:85:C101:BA30:A985:1173:EE5F:238D (talk) 20:49, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.