User talk:2601:741:C281:1110:D461:2452:82E8:80EC

This is 2601:741:C281:1110:D461:2452:82E8:80EC's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: The False Prince and the True (film) (July 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The False Prince and the True (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 16:52, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 2601:741:C281:1110:D461:2452:82E8:80EC! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 16:52, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:Encanto 2

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Talk:Encanto 2, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 17:14, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sing 2

Hi, I understand and appreciate you would like to help edit Wikipedia, so here are a few helpful pointers.

Per the Manual of style, specifically section WP:FILMPLOT, film plot summaries are to be less than 700 words and only contain the most essential information, not extraneous side details or extra, unnecessary descriptions of scenes play-by-play (which often can be considered editorials and not accurate). They also are generally written in present tense. Some of your edits to Sing 2 were in past tense and also caused some run-on sentences with extraneous detail. You are, of course, welcome to make edits here as you wish; however, edits that don't match the manual of style are subject to reversion and once they have been reverted it is best to not simply put them back/revert the correction without further discussion on the article's talk page (See WP:Editwar).

In future, before adding to a plot summary, especially one that is already long, it might be best to A) Make sure your edit meets wordcount guidelines, B) make sure even if it doesn't take things over wordcount, it is strictly advancing the plot and not just adding details unnecessarily, and C)See if there was any plot summary related discussions/debates in the talk page or the edit history, because what you're trying to add may have been discussed already. Some good places besides the Manual of style to practice writing are The teahouse and the sandbox.

I hope this helps. Plot summaries are often the most messy and unencyclopedic parts of articles because of people not following these guidelines, and treating it as a "Wiki Fandom" site article, where any and all details would gain precedence over correct grammar/procedure/keeping it concise. Sometimes admins and long-time users can't get to them all in time, so you'll see articles that are messy like that from time to time, but that does not mean they're actually supposed to be/allowed to be like that. If you see one, it's best to flag it for correction. Thanks, EEBuchanan (talk) 17:06, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The False Prince and the True (film) (July 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still unsourced

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The False Prince and the True (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 17:48, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. EEBuchanan (talk) 17:53, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I again reverted the edits that were incorrect, as well as some added by another IP that tended to the same purpose. Please read the manual of style and the earlier comments here and on the edit history, before you revert or edit the Sing 2 article again. If you revert it again, I will have to let it sit a day or two because I do not want to get flagged by theEdit Warring rule, but admins have been made aware of this situation since you did not answer me the last couple times so if you would like to discuss this with me or with them on the talk page of the article or on the noticeboard you can. Thanks! EEBuchanan (talk) 21:32, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.