User talk:2601:401:C503:3A70:7B41:6A50:F3AB:172E

October 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Josh Kruger, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Squeakachu (talk) 03:14, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Josh Kruger. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. If the source doesn't discuss the legality of the relationship then it doens't belong in our article. Squeakachu (talk) 03:36, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

you refer to statutory rape as romantic relationship. The article states he was 15 years old.

"If the source doesn't discuss the legality of the relationship then it doens't belong in our article."

This completely contradicts how Wikipedia works. You post articles as sources and pull certain information from them while inserting other information to fit the discussion. If we go by what you say, why not just copy and paste the entire article? It doesn't take a genius to take information from an article i.e. the murderer was 15 when Josh Kruger began having sex with him, and then extrapolate that information into him committing staturtory rape according to Pennsylvania law. If you have a problem with my wording or not referencing Pennsylvania law with a source fine. But you need to actually include facts. Like he was in an illegal relationship committing staturtory rape. Not white washing it by saying it was a romantic relationship. 2601:401:C503:3A70:7B41:6A50:F3AB:172E (talk) 04:00, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Josh Kruger, you may be blocked from editing. —C.Fred (talk) 03:49, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

• You're at two strikes right now on two counts:
  • WP:3RR says that any editor who reverts an article more than 3 times within 24 hours is subject to being blocked. Your edits do not qualify for an exemption.
  • Personal attacks against other editors are unacceptable and are grounds for blocking as well.

You may have a point that the context about statutory rape needs mentioned—but there needs to be consensus about including it, and possibly a stronger source than assertions from the mother of the alleged victim. —C.Fred (talk) 04:15, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —C.Fred (talk) 04:21, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

---