User talk:2601:3C5:8200:97E0:E54A:68DA:F1B5:7F0D

December 2020

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on College rock; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 02:14, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocking request and comment on college rock edit dispute.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2601:3C5:8200:97E0:E54A:68DA:F1B5:7F0D (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

While I do apologize for being disruptive, I do feel my block was punitive if this isnt a punitive block please inform me on what would be one. On top of the user:Binksternet has been blocked nearly a dozen times for edit warring. Yet for some reason he wasn't given a warning not to edit war. Heck just look at his contributes 90% of his edits is just him fighting with other users over genres. Anyways I think I was wrongly blocked wikipedia should be fair both users should be blocked. 2601:3C5:8200:97E0:E54A:68DA:F1B5:7F0D (talk) 03:09, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

WP:NOTTHEM. Please see WP:EXPLICITGENRES, and read WP:GAB before requesting unblock again. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:38, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I wasnt saying to block the user. I was pointing out his history and how his action lead to my block. i am addressing the block and the reason it happened, which wikipedia wants me to do. My block should be undone because it was a clear violation of the blocking policy. Admins must follow the rules set here Wikipedia:Administrators--2601:3C5:8200:97E0:E54A:68DA:F1B5:7F0D (talk) 04:53, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.