Jump to content

User talk:2601:196:180:DC0:E8B9:341A:CE82:54BC

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Brayan Waelchi. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Chemise have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Brayan Waelchi (talk) 04:58, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Brayan Waelchi. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Chemise have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Brayan Waelchi (talk) 04:58, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea what you are up to, but both of these are valid edits with explicit edit summaries.
1. The WP:MOS instructs against gratuitous bolding in the 1st sentence of the lead (and anywhere thereafter).
2. Who? Who is this person? Why should we care, listen to, or trust them? A context for their notability is essential, as is a *citation* supporting the quote and claim.
Thankfully someone else has already reverted your unwarranted and ill-considered reversions. 2601:196:180:DC0:E8B9:341A:CE82:54BC (talk) 05:04, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Um, sorry. I didn't see your message. The account who warned you above is a long-term abuser, please ignore it. Frost 05:13, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
wait is it a bot? 172.59.210.195 (talk) 05:17, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Gee, it appears they only registered (under that user name) today.
It is beyond me how new users end up on new changes patrol. There should be much more stringent requirements before a user is allowed to do that crucial job (which sends more users packing after bad initial experiences than any other cause in the encyclopedia). Like 90 days and 500 or 1000 edits. Something that shows they've been around, *contributed*, and know the encyclopedia's rules and mores.
Granting that a great way to expand one's understanding of the "rules of the road" at Wikipedia is reviewing new changes...with a solid working knowledge of the WP:MOS. Not absent it. 2601:196:180:DC0:E8B9:341A:CE82:54BC (talk) 05:18, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]