User talk:2601:18E:C380:1DC0:6782:E9C4:BD68:5CE6

April 2024

Your recent editing history at Norse colonization of North America shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Doug Weller talk 18:52, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Vinland, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Source is 51 years old there's been a lot of research since Doug Weller talk 19:01, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Very surprised "Magnusson & Palsson" is not considered a reliable source. I just looked at the "Citing sources" and don't see anything about passage of time as a limiting factor.

Would Carl Sauer be considered to be a reliable source? He also endorsed the southern New England theory- along with many other credible researchers, such as Einar Haugen and Askell Love. 2601:18E:C380:1DC0:6782:E9C4:BD68:5CE6 (talk) 19:29, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Off to bed. Age would not be mentioned there it’s somewhere else but I can’t find it tonight it seems obvious anyway. Goodnight. Doug Weller talk 20:24, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.