Jump to content

User talk:2600:6C67:617F:421D:C068:68A:3F66:ACCE

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm AntiDionysius. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Presidency of John F. Kennedy seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. AntiDionysius (talk) 13:09, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What I posted is consistent how all economists define Keynesian, versus Classical, Economics. All economists agree that Keynesian economics focuses on a short run employment, while classical economics focuses on long run growth and price stability. This is in every textbook. The version of Keynesian Economics that Kennedy embraced (on the advice of James Tobin, Walter Heller and Paul Samuelson) specified a stable trade off between short run unemployment and the current rate of inflation (check your own Wikipedia page on the Phillips curve). It is the classical alternative, as expoused by Milton Friedman, which focuses on long run growth and price stability, the long run Phillips Curve. (check your own Wikipedia pages on this too). I have a PhD in economics. I taugh economics for over 20 years. Where are you getting your information from? Do you have a valid source, or is this just your own personal bias? 2600:6C67:617F:421D:C068:68A:3F66:ACCE (talk) 14:15, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.